|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 27th, 2008, 10:05 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
If you're outputting it as progressive frames, then no, this setting won't be used (e.g., going from 1080p30 to HD 1080p30). But, if you're downconverting to interlaced, then you need to specify the frame order for it to play back correctly. Brent |
|
|
|
|
January 28th, 2008, 04:27 PM
|
#17 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 51
|
every SD dvd must be interlaced?? in order to play back better?
__________________
Go for 16 gig Ram its worth! |
|
|
|
|
January 28th, 2008, 05:40 PM
|
#18 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 48
|
Phleeeease, could someone (with sufficient knowledge) post a workflow (in steps) of down converting form HD to SD and then sending to SD DVD. The more I read about it the more confusing it gets!
I think this is one of the greatest concerns living in a transitional face. A lot of us will be shooting HD and down converting to SD and then to SC DVD. Any input would be greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
January 28th, 2008, 05:53 PM
|
#19 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 51
|
yes! please read this
__________________
Go for 16 gig Ram its worth! |
|
|
|
|
January 28th, 2008, 05:58 PM
|
#20 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 48
|
Thanks Joel!
|
|
|
|
|
January 29th, 2008, 10:15 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Yes - that's my understanding. For the best compatibility, interlaced is best - many players will then deinterlace to 480p on playback. Brent |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
