|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 9th, 2008, 09:45 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 496
|
Nikon D3X 24.5mp
|
|
|
|
December 9th, 2008, 09:48 AM
|
#2 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bristol, CT (Home of EPSN)
Posts: 1,192
|
I'm a Nikon guy, but the 5DM2 blows this camera away on a cost/performance basis.
|
|
|
|
|
December 29th, 2008, 11:07 AM
|
#3 |
|
Go Go Godzilla
|
Paul's assessment is spot-on; the D3X is way overpriced for what you get and doesn't even have the ultra-high ISO capabilities of the D700. Nikon's flagship cameras have always come in around $5500; why Nikon decided to price this into the realm of the 1Ds MkIII makes no sense and has alienated all but the serious pros on cost alone.
If you're a Nikon shooter the D700 is currently the best bang-for-the-buck available. If you're considering which platform to use, the Canon "5D2" as it's being referred to is king of the hill. For now. I plan on getting the lens adapter for my specialty Nikkors and using them on the 5D2. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
