|
|||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2026
Location: London, England
Posts: 11
|
Audio for nature videos
Hi,
I hope that this is ok to post here as I'm not sure if this belongs in the "All Things Audio" section? Anyway I have 2 scenarios that hopefully I'll get some ideas into which direction to go down.... Scenario 1: For this scenario I've been following 2 videos for ideas and I'm a little lost! The first by Morten Hilmer (Danish wildlife photographer/film maker and vlogger: and the second by Petri Koivisto from Finlamd: As there are many different ways of doing this I really want to figure out a solid direction to get started. One of my ideas was to use a Sound Devices MixPre 3 or 6 linked to a stereo X/Y pair; Morten does this on a T-bar mount while Petri seems to use the Audio Technica BP4025 stereo mic I'm not sure what mics would be a good choice for this as my experience is in music studio recording and not live sound or field recording. I kinda had a look at a Neumann KM 184 Matched Pair - which is great if your doing overheads for drums but not sure about field recording? In terms of directional mic, will any shotgun mic work well? Again the Sennheiser MKE 600 is discussed, but what about something like a Neumann KMR 81 or 82 i? Incidentally I have the Sennheiser MKE 400 but haven't used it much, only really for voice overs in terms of narration. How would say a large or small diaphragm FET based mic work out in this type of scenario or are there more suited mics? Also does polar pattern matter too for this type of application? I guess it depends on preference and what you are trying to do..... Scenario 2: A little more complex as for this I wanted to mix and match a group of up to 4 speakers with ambient sounds. It would be a single shooter "run and gun" style scenario where you are following 3 - 4 people all hooked up to wileress lav mics in a forest or somewhere. Looking at options from DJI, Rhode, Sennheiser etc.... they all have a standard Rx unit with 3.5mm output that can be linked to 2x wireless Tx mics (I have the DJI Mic 2 (single) that I use in Bluetooth mode and it is pretty good for speech) If using a camera like the Canon R5C which only has a single 3.5mm stereo input, what would be the best way of doing this? It seems a little tricky but my current thought was something along the lines of a field-recorder that can take up to 4x jack inputs or 2x jack and 1x 3.5mm aux stereo input The MixPre's I think you can get like a sling bag for them which would make them a little clunky for this, while using something like a Zoom H5/6Studio you could belt or pocket clip it (there's a picture on the website showing something like this) then use the 2x lav module for it and then get any external dual lav Tx/Rx combo of choice. As a total beginner here with this, how would you then go to rig this all up? As in, taking the Zoom H5/6Studio option... sure it's just a 3.5mm to 1/4" mono jack for the remaining 2x mics but then you need timecode. By default the Canon has a DIN connector while the Zoom needs bluetooth using an Atomos module or can use a Tentacle SyncE module linked to an audio track... that's fine as you have 2x tracks remaining in the device I guess you'd need another SyncE for the Canon too then? so how and where would you place these things? Would you just stick them in your pockets or use a cage like something from SmallRig and either screw or zip ties these things somewhere? If you wanted to add ambient sounds too, would you then just go ahead and Jam Sync the time code to the MixPre discussed earlier and leave that positioned statically somewhere? Maybe I'm over complicating things here but from what I can see this is kind of the best way that I could think of to do this....? How useful would timecode be in a situation where you need speed of setup? Neither Morten nor Petri talked about audio/video sync so I'm a little lost here!! Any suggestions would be really appreciated :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lakeland Florida
Posts: 699
|
Re: Audio for nature videos
The biggest problem I have with audio for wildlife videos comes from the presence of traffic noise, aircraft (jets, helicopters etc.) flying overhead, and sounds people in the area are making, talking, playing music, vehicle noise (even electric bikes can have noisy rattles etc). The second problem comes from the proximity effect, other sounds being closer than the sound you want.
What I do is mute or even delete all the sounds in my recording except for the brief time the exact sound I want is being made. Then, in editing I lay another track of ambient sound to take its place. For example, in a recent video I made of a pair of young owls that some friends and I had been keeping track of for several weeks, I used audio from the same marsh maybe fifty yards away I had recorded before sunrise. The location was the Circle B Bar Reserve near my home in Lakeland Florida. A busy road (Winter Lake Road) runs just outside the gate of the reserve on the north side. The county landfill is only about two miles away, so there's a lot of traffic, including a lot of garbage trucks, that starts around 7 am. In addition, US Hwy 98 is to the west of the reserve, a little farther away, but the sound carries and the heavy traffic will fill a video with a dull roar most of the time. Finally, Lakeland has a busy airport now, with a very busy Amazon facility with lots of jets flying in and taking off, many right over the nature preserve. That along with the Medivac Helicopters flying patients to area hospitals flying directly overhead can spoil many a shot. All this adds undesired sound to the recording. A lot of undesired sounds. So, the problem isn't so much getting the sound I want, as it is eliminating all the sound I don't want. To get the sound I want, I simply use a very directional shotgun mike mounted on an arm (with a shock mount to minimize rattles) off the camera ( to minimize noise from the camera and my own breathing). Then I boost the sound I want as needed in post, using noise reduction too, because there will still be traffic noise. Unless you are way out in the wild, alone, don't be expecting quality sound whatever equipment you may use. Plus, how much stuff do you want to carry around out on the trails? In hot, humid Florida, carrying more water is more useful that carrying more gear. Here's a link to the owl video I mentioned, after video and audio editing. https://youtu.be/0ueg_4GBciw?si=2Q6-WcORJ7fs2Mfy |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lakeland Florida
Posts: 699
|
Re: Audio for nature videos
One thing I forgot to mention, the more gear you take the longer it takes to set it all up. The action you want to record will likely be over in a matter of seconds much of the time. This is a case where less truly is more. You will be more likely to get your shot before the action is over the less you are trying to set up. Most all of those alligator crossings in the videos on my channel were over in less than ten seconds. Birds tend to give you even less time, as do bobcats and other predators. A long telephoto lens can enable you to get the visuals, but to record sound you need to be much closer, and animals are very hard to sneak up on most of the time. In the owl video I was more than a hundred feet away. To make the owls vocalization audible, I had to boost the sound, which boosted the other noise while the owl was making its little peeps. When I left snippets of my conversation with another photographer that was also getting her shots, you can hear the dull roar of the distant traffic on the road that I could not remove any further. When I filmed people before I retired, I mic'd them up with wireless lavaliers or mounted a standalone microphone just out of frame. You can't do that with animals. If the microphone isn't a matter of inches from the source, you won't get quality results for a client, whether filming the wedding vows, a corporate presentation, or testimony in or for the courtroom. I used to have to do all of these, and I had a huge Pelican rolling case with two other cases stacked on top to wheel into a job site. That approach isn't practical when I might have to hike several miles on a muddy or overgrown trail filming wildlife.
Last edited by Roger Van Duyn; Today at 08:37 AM. Reason: another thought |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2026
Location: London, England
Posts: 11
|
Re: Audio for nature videos
Hi again Roger, and thank you for the pointers!
That actually is something that I was thinking about and funnily enough while watching your owl video there was a blackbird twittering in the garden. I went out to check and even thought of getting a quick photo using my 600mm f/4 but it wasn't worth it... taking what you were saying into account I listened. Ok I'm in the middle of a crowded city and near an airport so far from ideal but yeah... plane noise, talking, traffic noise and that's before even getting to the bird :-( Of course I would be in woodland areas but then even the video I posted of the guy in Finland said a similar thing along the lines of you too in that traffic noise is a problem. Finland is a large and fairly quiet country so that tells you a lot! Also I totally agree about the pointers of time. That's why I was asking.... I guess this is the difference between watching and waiting for action in which you can setup first then sit and wait or spontaneously shooting action as you soon as you arrive or see something Sure you have a thing called an EQ with shelving filters but when noise is broadband it can't be completely eliminated. Again what was discussed in the Finish video about sound masking to flush out "interference" by using wind direction etc... Hmm...... Really liking the owl video though :-) nice smooth zooming in and really clear footage!! |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|