|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 1126
|
![]() |
#2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Coast - NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,606
|
ohh - that was different - loved the rings at the end (or was that the start?)
It works for me because it leaves things unsaid, which I assume should be the point of a teaser - to tease or entice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 41
|
Hi Matt,
The reverse works well to finish at the start. Could I just say that for me personally, it's a very slow song and the slow mo felt a bit too slow. For me, the first shot didn't seem long enough which didn't give me the opportunity to appreciate it in the same way as the church seen at 0.43. I liked seeing some of the close ups mixed in with the dancing & wondered if you toyed with more real time dancing - very much liked the audio inclusion. Perhaps also, a bit of audio during the vows may give more connection to the piece. Loved the close up of the bride and the ring shot..very clever. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kingscliff, Australia
Posts: 196
|
Cheers Paul & Dean for taking the time to view and comment - much appreciated.
Dean - fair point with the slo-mo and generally I really try to steer away from using it. I did this edit both with and without slo-mo but with this particular track (which was their bridal waltz) only a couple of the shots felt right in real time. Ditto with the cross dissolves. I have to give credit for the backwards spinning ring shot. I really like Ray Roman films and this was an idea I got from one of his recent clips, and thought as this one was edited in reverse it would be a perfect closing shot. Thanks again! Cheers, Matt. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|