|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 30th, 2009, 05:50 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 2630
|
September 30th, 2009, 06:11 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 692
|
looks great man! love the treatment you have done with your titles.
|
September 30th, 2009, 06:46 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kingscliff, Australia
Posts: 196
|
Nice work Glen - always look forward to seeing your stuff so thanks for sharing.
Very tight edit and great time shifting. The opening speech with the sand was superb. Did you use any external lighting at all? Looked like it was all available light and looked really good. Cheers, Matt. P.S. It was a really sloooow download for me. I'm not on a super fast connection - 1.5MB/s but it seemed to max out around 20kb/s. |
September 30th, 2009, 08:37 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Satellite Beach, Fl
Posts: 784
|
Well done, I really enjoyed it!!
|
October 1st, 2009, 10:30 AM | #5 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
|
|
October 1st, 2009, 10:31 AM | #6 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Thanks Scott! Hey how are you- long time no speak!
|
October 4th, 2009, 06:00 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 253
|
Beautiful work. Fabulous location. Just very nice... great job, Glen!
|
October 4th, 2009, 06:12 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia, pa
Posts: 705
|
Glen,
What were yourcamera settings. Did you have to bump up the gain levels? |
October 4th, 2009, 06:14 PM | #9 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Hey, thanks Bill.
|
October 4th, 2009, 06:14 PM | #10 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Yes most (if not all) of the reception footage was shot at +12db and 1/24th shutter.
|
October 4th, 2009, 06:31 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia, pa
Posts: 705
|
wow +12, how did you avoid all the grain and the streaking withthe 1/24 setting?
Last edited by Kevin Lewis; October 5th, 2009 at 09:43 AM. |
October 14th, 2009, 07:21 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 768
|
Glen...
I still remember a thread you commented on a couple months ago about having to push your camera to the limits in low light. You pull it off so well and this video was a wonderful example on backing up your words. I loved it... Steve |
October 14th, 2009, 10:46 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arta, Greece
Posts: 342
|
Amazing wedding and fantastic editing. But what impressed me most, was the fact that you have these results by using the camera at its very limits. It looks so smooth for 1/24!
|
October 18th, 2009, 07:35 AM | #14 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
To be fair the footage and full resolution does have quite a bit more visible grain in it. The Ceremony was quite possibly the darkest environment I've ever shot in. Of course I was pushing the camera as far as I'm comfortable then pushing the mid-tones and highlights (standard color corrector) in post.
One of the unsung benefits to downconversion to SD DVD (and web) is it seems to help smooth noise out via the down-conversion. PS One of the keys to good low light performance is to NOT use any noise-reduction filters in camera. |
October 18th, 2009, 11:25 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 913
|
"PS One of the keys to good low light performance is to NOT use any noise-reduction filters in camera."
hmmmm could you explain that in more detail Glen? |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|