Delivering SD from HD at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Wedding / Event Videography Techniques
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Wedding / Event Videography Techniques
Shooting non-repeatable events: weddings, recitals, plays, performances...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 26th, 2010, 08:33 AM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nebo, NC
Posts: 111
Delivering SD from HD

We have just switched to HD cameras (Panasonic HMC150s) and have some questions on shooting and exporting. For weddings that will be delivered on DVD what format do you shoot in?

How do you export from Premiere Pro CS4 to retain the best quality.

Where the footage is HD can you zoom in and retain quality when outputting to SD?

thanks
Janice DeMille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2010, 04:26 AM   #2
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
Hi Janice

It all depends on whether you are going to edit in HD and then render down to SD or rather transcode to SD first. (Panny have a free transcoder..I left a link on the AVCHD forum)
It's probably better not to shoot in interlaced mode as HD and SD fields are reversed so progressive footage will downsize better to 720x480 without interlacing lines in the source footage!!
Unfortunately I use Sony Vegas and there are extensive threads on the Vegas forum about HD to SD but I prefer to transcode my AVCHD direct to SD first and then edit as the render times are a fraction of rendering HD to SD. It just suits my workflow. When I come back from a wedding shoot I actually create two folders for each camera card..one is AVCHD and the other is transcoded SD AVI so even before I start I have a choice which way to go!!

Chris
Chris Harding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2010, 04:34 AM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 203
How do you like the quality when you convert to SD dvd chris?
Kiflom Bahta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2010, 06:11 AM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 692
the HMC150 delivers gorgeous SD product shot in 720p. I actually sat down and watched my work with a wedding planner and was amazed at how good it looked in SD. now keep in mind, i NEVER watch the discs I make. I send them out and done. From what clients have told me regarding the blu ray product, it looks like you are there with them. I still dont have a blu ray player
Scott Hayes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2010, 06:28 AM   #5
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
Hi Kiflom

I have done countless tests with AVCHD, HDV and SD all to a DVD in the usual MPEG2 format and on a 42" LCD TV you have to look pretty hard to see any differences!! Remember that you are comparing clips against each other !!!! Give the bride just one DVD and she wouldn't know the difference!! I'm 100% happy with my SD transcoded quality.

In fact shooting at the lowest bitrate there is no resolution change either but you will get a few artifacts and even vertical line skews. Edit AVCHD to SD and render 10 minutes of video in 30 mins or more or edit SD rendered to SD in under 5 minutes???? I need the faster workflow I can't have both computers tied up for hours and hours rendering footage!!

Chris
Chris Harding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2010, 07:28 AM   #6
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nebo, NC
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Harding View Post
Hi Janice

It all depends on whether you are going to edit in HD and then render down to SD or rather transcode to SD first. (Panny have a free transcoder..I left a link on the AVCHD forum)
It's probably better not to shoot in interlaced mode as HD and SD fields are reversed so progressive footage will downsize better to 720x480 without interlacing lines in the source footage!!
Unfortunately I use Sony Vegas and there are extensive threads on the Vegas forum about HD to SD but I prefer to transcode my AVCHD direct to SD first and then edit as the render times are a fraction of rendering HD to SD. It just suits my workflow. When I come back from a wedding shoot I actually create two folders for each camera card..one is AVCHD and the other is transcoded SD AVI so even before I start I have a choice which way to go!!

Chris
Chris what format do you shoot in before you transcode down? I had originally thought I would shoot in 1080p, edit in HD and render to SD. I want to run the cameras fair static during the ceremony and zoom in during the edit making 2 cameras look like 4. I haven't tried to edit anything yet so not sure what my system can handle. I have a quad processor with Premiere CS4 and will be up grading to Windows 64 bit.
Janice DeMille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2010, 06:32 PM   #7
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
I actually shoot all my video interlaced!! 1080i but that is my preference. If you are going to transcode to AVI directly then you can shoot progressive or interlaced. However if you are intent on going the AVCHD to SD route then it's essential to shoot is progressive mode so you don't have any interlacing line issues during downsizing.

If you do use the Panasonic transcoder don't shoot in 720P as it doesn't handle that mode for some reason!! It's free so you might as well try it anyway???

Chris
Chris Harding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 04:08 AM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 162
HD to SD is always a hot topic. I find that in CS4, editing HD, then using the active link (or whatever it's called)direct to an Encore timeline gives good results. I tried these methods in a test, and rank them from best image quality to worst:

1. HDV 25p (or Cineform 25p) Premiere output to a1920x1080 25p cineform file. Then I use Procoder 3 to make a MPEG-2, then import this to Encore. Looks great, but is time-consuming.

2. HDV timetine active linked to Encore, let Encore encode. Looks great, and is easy and fast. Using just Adobe tools, this is clearly the best way.

3. Export HDV using AME High Export Quality MPEG-2, then imported to Encore. Not as good, long render, more artifacts, but doable.

4. Same as 3, but not HQ. Softer, artifacts, barely usable.

I often pan-and-scan and zoom in to reframe or adjust tilt. I find it is invisible up to about 135% , but noticeable beyond this.

Last edited by Bill Engeler; February 28th, 2010 at 04:14 AM. Reason: edited to fix some spelling
Bill Engeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 04:30 AM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 203
I shoot hdv with my a1 and use AME to make mt2 files for encore and the result is great. i also use encore direct from premier and the results are the same. i am getting a new camera but don't what get yet. iam also getting a new pc with a lot of muscle to go with my new camera.
Kiflom Bahta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 05:19 AM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
Hi Guys

Just bear in mind that Janice has an HMC150 so HDV footage doesn't really come into the mix. The camera shoots in AVCHD format so she would be more interested in using AVCHD in Adobe CS4 ..(I use Vegas 9 so I cannot help here, sorry!!)

I think what's needed is a CS4 workflow using AVCHD footage

A Quadcore is fine for AVCHD editing..I can even manage stuff on my DuoCore!!!

Chris
Chris Harding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 12:20 PM   #11
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nebo, NC
Posts: 111
That is right Chris.

Thanks everyone on the information. Maybe I should start a new thread asking if anyone is editing AVCHD in Premiere CS4 and start there.
Janice DeMille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 12:43 PM   #12
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Harding;1492384e
A Quadcore is fine for AVCHD editing..I can even manage stuff on my DuoCore!!!
You get full frame playback in Vegas on your dual-core? Really?
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels.
Perrone Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 06:52 PM   #13
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
Hi Perrone

I said I can manage stuff on my DuoCore ... I didn't say it's awesome!!!! Unfortunately the preview battles somewhat!! especially over transitions. Straight video previews pretty well but as soon as it hits a speed bump it struggles... The point here was that yes, I can physically take an AVCHD clip ..drop it on the timeline and render it out to an MPEG2 SD video. DuoCore 2.2GHz with WinXP and 3GB ram.
The only stuff I have done in AVCHD is test clips really...all the weddings are transcoded to AVI first and, of course, the files run sweetly without any hiccups!!

Sorry if my post made it look like I was running AVCHD perfectly on a DuoCore, however you CAN do it if you are patient!!!

Chris
Chris Harding is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Wedding / Event Videography Techniques


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network