NTSC vs Default Template (Uncompressed) at DVinfo.net

Jeff Harper · January 20th, 2008, 02:06 PM

What's the difference between rendering NTSC vs Default Template (uncompressed) when rendering .avi files?

I am converting a batch of vegas projects into flv files for play on the web. since Vegas doesn't do conversion to flv, I'm rendering out avi's then rendering the avi's via another program.

The size difference is someting like X10, but I don't see huge difference in quality with final product. Am I missing something?

Don Bloom · January 20th, 2008, 02:25 PM

Jeff,
I've never rendered flvs either but in messing around with the 2 formats I have not seen any differenece in quality but the size of uncompressed will kill ya. ;-)

Uncompressed is great to maintain an Alpha channel.

Don

Jeff Harper · January 20th, 2008, 03:34 PM

Thanks Don!

January 20th, 2008, 02:06 PM	#1
Jeff Harper Inner Circle Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 8,425	NTSC vs Default Template (Uncompressed) What's the difference between rendering NTSC vs Default Template (uncompressed) when rendering .avi files? I am converting a batch of vegas projects into flv files for play on the web. since Vegas doesn't do conversion to flv, I'm rendering out avi's then rendering the avi's via another program. The size difference is someting like X10, but I don't see huge difference in quality with final product. Am I missing something?

January 20th, 2008, 02:25 PM	#2
Don Bloom Inner Circle Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 6,609	Jeff, I've never rendered flvs either but in messing around with the 2 formats I have not seen any differenece in quality but the size of uncompressed will kill ya. ;-) Uncompressed is great to maintain an Alpha channel. Don

January 20th, 2008, 03:34 PM	#3
Jeff Harper Inner Circle Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 8,425	Thanks Don!