|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 28th, 2007, 11:53 PM | #31 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Mmm...personally, I feel like all of the tradeoffs in a camera like this are justified by the tiny size, so you can pocket it when necessary. It's pretty easy to build a camera out when you need it to be bigger with a 3rd party shoulder mount etc.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
January 29th, 2007, 08:43 PM | #32 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Just having the camera bigger is better. HV10 footage without a tripod looks just too amateur. And honestly... who'd carry a tripod in a once-in-a lifetime recording?
|
January 30th, 2007, 10:46 AM | #33 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Here is a picture of it.
http://usa.canon.com/app/html/See_Th...ce/index.shtml It was already posted in the Area 51 section. It looks like it wont have a focusing ring. |
January 30th, 2007, 05:52 PM | #34 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
^I still seriously think that's an HV10, an HV20 should look like the Optura Xi in my opinion.
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/...r-review-3.jpg |
January 31st, 2007, 07:30 AM | #35 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Since the HV20 was announced on Canon Japan's site late last night (and yes it does look sort of like an Optura Xi), I think it's safe to move this thread from Area 51 to our HV10 (and HV20) forum. No need to keep it open though. I'm sure the HV20 will (eventually) come back to the Circuit City pages. Thanks all,
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|