|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 28th, 2006, 02:14 AM | #16 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
I misunderstood how the CCD's processed the signal, I thought it was digital from the CCD and then went conversion to analog to go out the component. I believe I had it backwards Thanks for clearing that up for me. It's good to hear that the 14 bit A/D is on the front end and that everything will equally benifit from this improvement. More the reason to upgrade for us then. Is Diana still our contact (South-East) to get a 250 in for some hands on testing? Quote:
__________________
Our eyes allow us to see the world - The lens allows others to see the world through our eyes. RED ONE #977 |
||
October 28th, 2006, 06:34 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
|
The HD250's downright cheap even at list. Try pricing broadcast 720p camcorders some time and see what kind of numbers you come up with. And also take into consideration the fact that the market for broadcast equipment is incredibly tiny and manufacturers simply don't have the same economies of scale to work with as manufacturers of consumer products.
Also note that the HD250 is about the same price as the XLH1. If you could get either the XLH1 or the HD250 for the same price, which would you choose? For me, progressive scan and a proper lens just can't be beat. |
October 28th, 2006, 09:15 AM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
Will the 200 be available through B&H?
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
October 28th, 2006, 03:54 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Posts: 112
|
I don't know if this was asked before, but are the HD-100/110 scene files (.SCN) compatible with the 200/250?
|
October 29th, 2006, 09:50 PM | #20 |
JVC America
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 516
|
Daniel,
Please send me an e-mail so I can e-mail you the info you need to arrange a demo of a GY-HD250U. Regards,
__________________
Carl Hicks JVC Professional Products Company |
October 29th, 2006, 09:51 PM | #21 |
JVC America
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 516
|
Marc
Good question. I'll try to find out. Thanks,
__________________
Carl Hicks JVC Professional Products Company |
October 29th, 2006, 10:57 PM | #22 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
__________________
Our eyes allow us to see the world - The lens allows others to see the world through our eyes. RED ONE #977 |
|
November 1st, 2006, 03:56 PM | #23 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
The dutch JVC Pro distributor told me today that the scene files aren't compatible. I think that HD-200/250 user can use the recipes and enter the compatible parameters manually. |
|
November 2nd, 2006, 07:02 AM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 240
|
Speaking of highend HD, I just had a demo of the new HDX 900 2/3 DVCProHD camera. While the form factor and imager is really excellent.
The image isn't noticably better than the better than the HD100 when set up side by side. When you consider the $42k price with lens and viewfinder, it makes you realize what great value the HD including the 250 series is. Dave Beaty |
November 2nd, 2006, 09:52 AM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 256
|
Thanks for all of the updates and info.
Can you speak to the light sensitivity? Similar to the HD100 (I thought that was F8@2000)? I didn't know if that was in 24p with 1/48th shutter or if it was 30p at 1/60th either. Shy to discuss this - but is the front end similar as well? Of course there was a lot of conversation about SSE 'back in the day'. My HD100 was tweaked to accommodate & optimize against it. Just wondering... Glad to see the release - great set of cams... |
November 2nd, 2006, 04:46 PM | #26 | |
JVC America
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
__________________
Carl Hicks JVC Professional Products Company |
|
November 2nd, 2006, 04:49 PM | #27 | |
JVC America
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
Light sensitivity of the GY-HD200 and GY-HD250 is about the same as the GY-HD100 / 110 cameras. SSE is a non-issue now - resolved a long time ago. And, with the new camera's 14 bit A/D, we can make even more accurate calibration adjustments than ever before. Regards,
__________________
Carl Hicks JVC Professional Products Company |
|
November 2nd, 2006, 08:13 PM | #28 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Man,
I'm having a hard time reading this thread. I'm now wishing to own the HD200 or HD250! Although, I'm still really pleased with the HD100. Steve |
November 2nd, 2006, 08:40 PM | #29 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
November 2nd, 2006, 08:40 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
It seems that JVC is "intentionally" not promoting the release of the HD200 so much, as if not to sour or discourage people from buying the HD110. I for one, instead of getting the HD110 will wait 'til the HD200 comes out because all the improvements make it worth the wait, especially the image inversion, as I use a 35mm adapter and flipping the image will make life so much easier.
__________________
I will be KING! |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|