DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   The Long Black Line (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/long-black-line/)
-   -   Mini DV Decks (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/long-black-line/1166-mini-dv-decks.html)

fotoman001 October 28th, 2001 08:59 AM

dv decks
 
hello gang,
I'm looking in the archives for dv decks to save the wear and tear on my XL1.
Couldn't find anything...any thoughts on what's out there? Something basic, I don't really care for the bells & whistles; I'll save that for FCP...thanks, Ted.

Don Palomaki October 28th, 2001 01:10 PM

MiniDV? I use a Sony GV-D300, works well. Some folks use a ZR-10 or other low cost 1-CCD camcorder player/recorder for around the same price. As a bonus it gives a backup (if of limited capability) camcorder.

Chris Ward October 28th, 2001 09:02 PM

I have a Sony dsr-20 DVCAM/DV deck that has served me well. I firewire from my Canon XL-1 to make DVCAM protection masters of all my DV footage. It cost me $2700. new, but has been worth every penny.

Alexander Ibrahim October 30th, 2001 08:18 PM

JVC SR-VS10 and 20
 
This is a great deck for many uses...it integrates a MiniDV deck with a SVHS transport.

I have a review at:
http://www.zenera.com/reviews/jvcsrvs10u.html

Mike Butler November 5th, 2001 07:17 PM

As a variant on the ZR10 theme, I use an Elura. It has the analog inputs that the XL1 maddeningly lacks, plus as was pointed out, it serves as a backup camera. And the Elura is SO-O-O small, it works as a "stealth-cam" for shooting unnoticed. Yes, it's a one-CCD rig, but remarkable in performance for its size & price. The footage cuts in pretty well with other DV footage. Try having your assistant shoot some cutaways/B roll while you do the main shot. Of course, it is almost impossible to hold such a bitty thing still, but at least it doesn't take up much space in your bag.

Plus, the elura has a memory card to shoot stills to check the scene, lighting, etc. before rolling tape.

Chris Hurd November 5th, 2001 11:38 PM

Plus the Elura has the important secret weapon for one-chip camcorders... an RGB color filter. Goes a long way toward getting a three-chip look. The Elura and Optura Pi are the only Canons that have it.

Alan Van Vliet November 29th, 2001 12:34 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by Chris Ward : I have a Sony dsr-20 DVCAM/DV deck that has served me well. I firewire from my Canon XL-1 to make DVCAM protection masters of all my DV footage. It cost me $2700. new, but has been worth every penny. -->>>

Does this deck have high quality (1/5 speed) slow motion and or frame by frame capabilities?

Thanks, Al Van Vliet

Chris Ward November 29th, 2001 01:58 PM

It does both though I've only used the frame by frame.

Guy Pringle December 1st, 2001 12:07 AM

There's also the slightly cheaper Sony DSR-11 DVCAM/DV/miniDV deck that's nice and small. It is PAL/NTSC switchable. I've been using one with FCP and ShuttlePro and it works great! Only drawback I've found, so far, is that there is no timecode display.

David Phillips December 12th, 2001 02:37 PM

DV Decks
 
Hi all, I just logged on and there was a subject that's causing me a lot of grief at the moment Perhaps someone can throw some light on the prob.
We recently bought a Panasonic DV 2000 deck to save wear & tear on the XL1. When the tape is played back through the camera all is fine, but when we play the tape through the Panasonic deck the sound breaks up badly.
Panasonic inform us that the XL1 is at fault by not being properly aligned, whereby Canon inform us that that there is nothing wrong with the camera, but the deck in not compatible.
Who's telling the truth? Has anyone had similar experiences, if so what's the remedy?
Regards to all
David

Drewid20 December 12th, 2001 05:52 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by africats : There's also the slightly cheaper Sony DSR-11 DVCAM/DV/miniDV deck that's nice and small. It is PAL/NTSC switchable. I've been using one with FCP and ShuttlePro and it works great! Only drawback I've found, so far, is that there is no timecode display. -->>>

I think the DSR-11 will be the model I go with when my XL-1 gets here in a week. You can get some great deals on them on ebay. I just saw a new one in the box go for around 1500.

Don Donatello December 17th, 2001 04:45 PM

david phillips
 
i have a panasonic deck. my GL tapes play excellent .. however just recently on my canon elura tapes the sound is breaking up on the deck but they playback fine from GL & elura.

Mat Cain December 18th, 2001 01:43 PM

Reply to David Phillips:
 
Mr. Phillips,

I have a AGDV-2000 that works flawlessly with my XL-1s (plural) and my GL-1. I do have a question for you - are you recording in SP or LP? I have been told that to get the best results with LP that one should playback in the camera that shot the material. (I don't have a problem with that myself, but I wonder if it might be true in your case).

Another question - do you experience that problem with both the firewire out as well as analog (if it occours in only one it may help narrow down the problem).

Finally, if you would like to send me a tape I'd be happy so see if I can duplicate the problem on my deck.

Good Luck -

Mat Cain
DeCa Videoworks
decavideo@ev1.net

Mike Butler December 18th, 2001 02:04 PM

Mat,
If someone is actually taping in LP, let's try talking him out of it. Tape is cheap enough, and the added run time to be gained by taping at the lower speed is just not worth it. Can always buy more cassettes, but there's no way to go back and add quality to a recording. Just my $.02 here.

Mat Cain December 18th, 2001 05:21 PM

Graphics guy -

I know it is taboo to record in LP but I lets face it people do it all the time and I admit it... I do it on occasion as well. Though I don't prefer taping in LP - I find it difficult to see any noticeable image quality drop-off.

You seemed to miss the point of my post - I wasn't preaching the advantages of taping in LP but rather trying to help someone who has a problem. So "lets try" not to go off on a rant about our own personal views on tape speed and focus on helping folks on this forum.

Thanks for your $.02 and there is $.02 more....

Mat Cain
DeCa Videoworks





<<<-- Originally posted by the graphics guy : Mat,
If someone is actually taping in LP, let's try talking him out of it. Tape is cheap enough, and the added run time to be gained by taping at the lower speed is just not worth it. Can always buy more cassettes, but there's no way to go back and add quality to a recording. Just my $.02 here. -->>>

Vic Owen December 20th, 2001 11:05 PM

Re: DV Decks
 
David --

I have used a DV-2000 deck for quite a while. I've had no problems playing tapes shot on my XL-1. I have the deck tied into a MAC G3. During playback of recorded tapes, I get an occasional drop-out, but other than that, it's a pretty good deck. I also use the deck to make archive copies of projects on full size cassettes.

--Vic

<<<-- Originally posted by David Phillips : Hi all, I just logged on and there was a subject that's causing me a lot of grief at the moment Perhaps someone can throw some light on the prob.
We recently bought a Panasonic DV 2000 deck to save wear & tear on the XL1. When the tape is played back through the camera all is fine, but when we play the tape through the Panasonic deck the sound breaks up badly.
Panasonic inform us that the XL1 is at fault by not being properly aligned, whereby Canon inform us that that there is nothing wrong with the camera, but the deck in not compatible.
Who's telling the truth? Has anyone had similar experiences, if so what's the remedy?
Regards to all
David -->>>

Edward Troxel December 21st, 2001 03:11 PM

DV Decks
 
We also have a Panasonic AG-DV2000 and experienced sound problems with tapes recorded in an XL-1. We actually have 3 XL-1's and two their tapes played fine while the third one gave us problems with sound (which played fine in the XL-1 itself).

The bottom line was that the bad XL-1's heads were out of alignment. Upon repair, tapes from that camera played in the deck again (however, the bad tapes would no longer play in the camera because it was back in alignment and the tape was not). However, within 3 months, the camera was exhibiting the same symptoms once again. This time, canon replaced the heads and, to this point, we have not had another problem with that camera.

Justin Walter December 23rd, 2001 04:31 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by africats : There's also the slightly cheaper Sony DSR-11 DVCAM/DV/miniDV deck that's nice and small. It is PAL/NTSC switchable. I've been using one with FCP and ShuttlePro and it works great! Only drawback I've found, so far, is that there is no timecode display. -->>>

I also read that you can connect an analog source to the deck's inputs and have this video passed through the deck, straight over Firewire to a PC or Mac connected to it. If you need to import analog sources to your Firewire editing system, you don't need to record to DV tape first and transfer that to the computer later. With this deck, you can do that in one single pass.

This might be a stupid question but is the opposite also true? Can I connect an analog source to the deck's outputs and have the video passed from the computer through Firewire to the deck and out the composite video without recording to DV tape first?

Vic Owen December 23rd, 2001 11:53 AM

Yep -- Works just fine. My DV-2000 feeds a DA (Dist. Amp) and you can either record a DV tape simultaneously, or just use the deck as a D/A converter.

Cheers, Vic

Mike Butler December 26th, 2001 04:55 PM

Hey, that sounds great, sure wish my Elura would allow for Firewire capture of analogue sources without first making a digital master--it sure would save time. It does though, do direct to analogue going the other way, I can bang out VHS tapes right off the timeline feeding out of the A/V jacks on the Elura into the DA (dist amp) feeding my VHS decks. Of course I also am recording on the Elura at the same time anyway, may as well make a digital master of the finished edit while we're at it, it doesn't take any longer, but I don't have to.

David Phillips December 27th, 2001 01:13 PM

bad sound on panasonic DV-2000
 
Hi all,
many thanks for all your replies and offers of sollutions to our problem. However, we have now solved it in the following way.
The camera plays back perfectly, the problem only arises when we play back through the DV-2000, this is presumably because the Canon heads are not aligned properly.
To solve the problem we record a 'master' from the XL1 to the DV-2000 which then plays back perfectly.
We have also experienced a similar sound problem when using
Maxell tapes, which we no longer use.
Many thanks
David Phillips (Gemini Productions)

Jeff1769 March 6th, 2002 05:41 AM

Mini DV Decks
 
Any recomendations on a mini dv deck?
I have been looking at the JVC and Panasonics in the $1000 to $1500 price range.
I would like to hear any pros and cons about the different models out there.
Thanks,
Jeff

Ken Tanaka March 6th, 2002 02:38 PM

Jeff,
Using the Search function you should find many discussions related to DV decks here. The Sony DSR-11 is a (relatively) low-cost standard for miniDV/DVCam. I use a Panasonic AG-DV1000 deck (miniDV-only and many others use the AG-DV2000 with good results.

Chuck Eichmeyer March 6th, 2002 03:04 PM

I use the AG-DV2000. It works great for me.

B. Moore March 6th, 2002 11:48 PM

I use a mini-dv canon ZR-10 (now discontinued, bought it right after it became discontinued, $399)
with the firewire it connects to my G-4 AND I have an extra camera in a pinch. I usually shoot with an XL-1

John Locke March 7th, 2002 12:08 AM

I've always gone straight from my XL-1 to my Mac. What are the advantages of using a deck over the way I've been doing it? Mainly reducing wear and tear on the camera?

John Locke March 7th, 2002 12:14 AM

I've always gone straight from my XL-1 to my Mac. What are the advantages of using a deck over the way I've been doing it? Mainly reducing wear and tear on the camera?

Ken Tanaka March 7th, 2002 12:39 AM

Certainly, wear and tear on your camera's tape transport is a primary reason to use a deck for capture. But beyond that you'll quickly discover that deck transports are -much- quicker to cue and are designed for jog/shuttle operations that are so hard on cameras. Once you've used a deck you'll never want to go back to using a camera's transport.

Vic Owen March 7th, 2002 12:49 AM

Uh-Oh, John -- you have an echo......

Wear and tear is only one reason, from my perspective. My DV-2000 is also much more versatile and is always available. I print my masters on the full size cassettes, since many of the performances run 2 - 21/2 hours or so. The deck is connected to my DA, so it's an easy matter to make the VHS dubs.

If you're not doing the mastering and subsequent printing, then it's just a matter of doubling the wear and tear on a $4000 camera by using it as a VCR.

John Locke March 7th, 2002 01:21 AM

Thanks. Looks like yet another purchase I should probably add to the list. Never ends, does it?

Not sure if I can go with JVC or Panasonics in the price range Jeff1769 mentions. I'll check out the DV-2000 and see how much of a dent it'll put in my wallet.

Ken Tanaka March 7th, 2002 01:35 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by zchildress : Thanks. Looks like yet another purchase I should probably add to the list. Never ends, does it? -->>>

Never. But it wouldn't be any fun if it did, would it?

John, if you ever expect to have to deal with DVCam tapes (in or out) you should look at the Sony DSR-11 deck. It costs just a bit more and doesn't have the time code displays on the front panel (not very useful anyway when using your NLE) but it's small and would give you both miniDV and DVCam capabilities.

Just a recommendation.

John Locke March 7th, 2002 01:54 AM

Thanks, Ken. I'll check it out.

Vic Owen March 7th, 2002 09:04 AM

Ken has a good point, John. I've also been considering the Sony DSR-11. Pricewise, it comes in around the same as the DV-2000, and also will print both sizes of cassettes, PLUS operate in the DV-CAM mode. I get an occasional drop-out with standard DV format, and my guess is that the prevalence of this is less in DV-CAM.

You're right -- it REALLY never ends!

Chris Hurd March 7th, 2002 01:16 PM

Another advantage of the DSR-11 is that it's NTSC / PAL switchable (it will not transcode from one standard to another, however). The primary disadvantages of the DSR-11 is that it doesn't have a headphone jack and no front panel display. Some folks like the comfort of seeing those numbers turning, but with this deck all you'll get is a red light to insure you it's recording.

John Locke March 8th, 2002 09:35 PM

Sleepless in Seoul
 
You guys have me tossing and turning nights now, talking in my sleep "Deck. Deeeeck. Gotta git one. Gotta git ooooone."

So, since you're the source of the dark circles under my eyes...a couple more questions. First, I've sent off to proMAX for a quote on the DSR-11. At first glance, it does bug me that there isn't a front panel dislplay or headphone jack. To those of you that endorsed this model, if you had a chance to spend a bit more to get these things, would it be worth it? Or has the absense of these features been unnoticeable to you?

And Chris? Any recommendations for a model that does have the front panel display and headphones AND the sweet features of the DSR-11? I see a whole line of DSR models on ZGC...but nary a one has a price on it. So, no idea if the difference between each model is $1 or $1,000.

John Locke March 8th, 2002 09:48 PM

One more...
 
Considering how long I've been hanging around these forums, I'm a tad embarrassed to ask this question...related to the questions above. What the heck is DVCAM? And would I ever deal with DVCAM if I'm using the XL-1 and miniDV?

(remember, I'm in the land 'o zero English info!)

Chris Hurd March 8th, 2002 09:53 PM

Hi John,

DVCAM, eh? Run, don't walk, to Adam Wilt's DV FAQ website. Go to www.dvinfo.net, click on resources, then click on the link to his site. Spend at least an hour going over his material. He has a DV format comparison breakdown that spells everything out in plain english.

Adam is a hell of a nice guy; it's my hope that you'll get a chance to meet him in person sometime. He is *the* DV Guru of our modern age. Hope this helps,

John Locke March 8th, 2002 10:03 PM

Hi Chris,

Thanks for the link. I keep forgetting about that site for some reason. I read through Adam's comments on comparisons between DV, DVCAM, and DVPro...and this is the one line that stands out for me

<<What's the difference between DV, DVCAM, and DVCPRO? Not a lot!>>

So, not sure why having a DVCAM capability on a deck is something I should even worry about. From what he says, it all depends on the quality along the way...quality of the lens, quality of the camera, quality of the tape, and quality of the transfer and compression.

Adrian Douglas March 8th, 2002 10:51 PM

John,

As I understand it, remember I'm in the same boat, DVCAM is SONY's priority Pro DV Format, Panasonic has DVC Pro or is that JVC? Anyway, it uses MiniDV tapes but at a different tape speed and uses a different compression algorithum. I;m sure there is lots more, 50 something vs 25 something but I can't remember what.

I'm sure Don or Chris will have a more in depth answer

Vic Owen March 9th, 2002 01:25 AM

An upgrade from the DSR-11 that does have all the goodies displayed is the DSR-20. It comes in around 3K. I don't believe that is does PAL, though.

DV-CAM is a Sony format for laying down the code on mini-DV and full size DV cassettes. It runs at a faster speed than DV, and is a more robust format (i.e, less subject to drop-outs). The XL-1 will not record or play DV-CAM, but if you are printing to tape masters, DV-CAM is probably a little more reliable for a clean master tape.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network