DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony NEX-EA50 (all variants) (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nex-ea50-all-variants/)
-   -   New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nex-ea50-all-variants/510053-new-sony-nex-ea50eh-announcement.html)

Lee Mullen August 18th, 2012 03:05 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
What is there a big deal for Sony etc to go back to what Canon made in the 1990's. ie the Canon EX1/2/L1/2 Hi8 camera, the forerunner to the XL1 which had interchangable lens and a rocker button on the body??

Glen Vandermolen August 18th, 2012 06:38 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Piotr Wozniacki (Post 1748956)
Well, it looks like the information on the zoom rocker being integrated with the lens is not accurate; it clearly belongs to the camera body:

There is a zoom control on the lens. It may not be "proper," but it sure would be useful on my FS100:

Chris Medico August 18th, 2012 07:13 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
I've not seen any photos showing the lens zoomed in. Does it extend like the kit lens for the FS100/700 does?

Les Wilson August 18th, 2012 08:07 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jalan Salur (Post 1748964)
What is there a big deal for Sony etc to go back to what Canon made in the 1990's. ie the Canon EX1/2/L1/2 Hi8 camera, the forerunner to the XL1 which had interchangable lens and a rocker button on the body??

This is a naive view of the engineering involved. A button is insufficient. Zooming a lens requires a mechanical way to turn the lens mechanism. This is in the form of a zoom motor. The "button" is just a controller. If the motor is in the body, then there must be a mechanical connection to the lens mechanism which requires support by the lens manufacturer in the form of something in the connection or gearing on the ring. That means a body specific version of the lens. Ditto if the motor is in the lens as it appears to be in the new lens. The body must support the electrical control interface on the lens in order for the body's controller ("button") or possibly LANC connection to control the lens motor.

Les Wilson August 18th, 2012 08:11 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jalan Salur (Post 1748962)
There is no perfect camera because manufacturers deliberately hold back in an obsolescence form. Crafty.

Features cost money. Every feature you enable requires engineering to develop it, test it and maintain it. The more features, the more a camera costs. Additionally, you as a camera owner benefit from a manufacturer choosing model replacement timing and features. It comes in the form of resale value.

Wacharapong Chiowanich August 18th, 2012 08:13 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
The lens sure will telescope out when zooming in. It's just a matter of the lens hood racking out along with it or the lens body racking "out of" the lens hood. There is no way their engineers can make the zoom this long on the tele end while keeping the lens' body length the same as in the wide position with the current optical technology. All professional ENG zooms can be made non-telescopic simply because the image circles only need to cover the sensor size of 2/3" or smaller.

Brian Drysdale August 18th, 2012 10:47 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
35mm cine zoom lenses don't telescope when the focal length is changed, with the matte box systems used it would be a serious issue if they did.

Alister Chapman August 18th, 2012 11:57 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
According to the information I have from Sony the lens is essentially the same as the 18-200mm kit lens that comes with the FS100, only re housed with a servo motor to control the zoom. All the indications are that it telescopes in just the same way.

Alister Chapman August 18th, 2012 12:04 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wacharapong Chiowanich (Post 1748980)
The lens sure will telescope out when zooming in. It's just a matter of the lens hood racking out along with it or the lens body racking "out of" the lens hood. There is no way their engineers can make the zoom this long on the tele end while keeping the lens' body length the same as in the wide position with the current optical technology. All professional ENG zooms can be made non-telescopic simply because the image circles only need to cover the sensor size of 2/3" or smaller.

Really? There are plenty of non telescoping 35mm PL mount lenses with similar zoom ranges from Angenieux, Arri and Canon,. It can be done, it just isn't cheap. You can even add an adapter to a 2/3" lens to increase the size of the image circle to create a non-telescoping s35mm zoom. However it is much cheaper to take a varifocal dslr zoom and modify that.

Wacharapong Chiowanich August 18th, 2012 08:10 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Yes, but real 35s cinezooms are always humongous (so that the entire lens housing can accommodate the zoom movements required by the optical groups inside). I've never seen a handholdable and compact 35s zoom.

Brian Drysdale August 19th, 2012 01:14 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
The Angenieux Optimo zoom lenses are pretty compact and have an ENG style servo as an accessory.

Alister Chapman August 20th, 2012 09:14 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
And there's the Fujinon ENG style Cabrio compact PL mount zooms the same size as most 2/3" zooms and complete with hand grip and zoom rocker. It can be done, it just requires more sophisticated elements that move relative to each other much more precisely. All of which costs money.

Lets face it, very, very few people are going to buy a $35k lens for a $4k camcorder.

Matt Davis August 20th, 2012 09:37 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Crumbs, hasn't this little thread blossomed!

I did ask about LANC controllers - this is an E-Mount lens, so there's a manual 'switch' style zoom control on the lens, but the progressive multi-speed control that you'd get from a rocker must be communicated from the E-Mount.

So, I asked... "if I shoved one of these lenses on my FS100, and plugged my old Z1 LANC controller into the FS100, would I get vari-speed zoom from this lens?" (it wasn't quite pitched with these words, but you get the idea...).

There was a pause, and a 'yes, that sounds logical' answer. It may take another firmware upgrade to the FS100, but it would make sense.

Don't forget - this is a tweaked version of the kit lens - it shares so much in common with it.

It will turn your FS100/EA50 into the equivalent of the EX1 minus the last little bit of reach with the telephoto. Slightly better depth of field at f8 (this lens at f8 looks a little better than the EX1 lens at f2.8 regarding DoF), and that's not a bad thing quite frankly. :)

Alister Chapman August 20th, 2012 10:09 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
What I'm curious about is how will it handle focus? The 18-200mm kit lens is varifocal, so focus shifts when you zoom, this would make a servo zoom to be of little real benefit because as you zoom in and out, unless your using auto focus, the focus will change.

It is possible these days to programme a varifocal lens to shift it's focus as you zoom, this is how the EX cameras work, but that normally requires a back-focus setup routine or back focus adjustment. Most lenses only track focus accurately after back-focussing and even things like different thickness ND filters or temperature changes can upset this. I think we will have to wait and see if this new lens will track focus through the zoom range or whether you'll be forced to use autofocus to keep it in focus as you zoom.

Matt Davis August 20th, 2012 10:17 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
The EX1 lens is, if you hammer it (turn off servo zoom, whack the zoom in and out), varifocal save for a little lens element that squeaks around trying to keep things sharp.

If I do a slow creep zoom with the kit lens, the AF seems to keep up with things so long as it doesn't get distracted by the background.

So, I think - yes, the kit lens' varifocal nature will be modified to provide a sort of Parfocalness, which will be easily overcome by snap zooms, and I hope that because the AF is a co-operation between camera and lens, the offset required for NDs will be built in - but that's at the expense of slow response all round.

It will probably be an £800 lens with high profit margin, competing with your high end SD ENG lens at £8k. It will fulfil the needs of Event Videography very well, but no free lunches. We'll hear complaints of focus drift on the FS100, slow response on the FS700, and probably no complaints from the EA50 camp. :)

Still - remember the EX1's slow zoom?

Lee Mullen August 20th, 2012 09:29 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Les Wilson (Post 1748979)
Features cost money. Every feature you enable requires engineering to develop it, test it and maintain it. The more features, the more a camera costs. Additionally, you as a camera owner benefit from a manufacturer choosing model replacement timing and features. It comes in the form of resale value.

Really?? Sorry I dont agree. I suspect makers know what they are doing.

Ron Evans August 21st, 2012 07:19 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jalan Salur (Post 1749279)
Really?? Sorry I dont agree. I suspect makers know what they are doing.

I expect you are both correct. Sony in particular are good at using essentially the same camera with features turned off as the models progress down in price. In the consumer models it is very obvious. NX5U and AX2000 are good examples. NX30 and PJ760 is another. Sometimes there is a bigger change but the core camera is the same like the NX70 and CX700.

The R&D is clearly done on the the more complex camera and then marketing dictates the feature set for the real products.

Ron Evans

Les Wilson August 21st, 2012 11:12 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Jalan,
Building products on common components is just a smart way to produce products for different markets. A consumer product that doesn't have a bunch a features that the higher end model has is cheaper to produce so therefore it can have a lower price. Just because the "core" is the same, doesn't mean the cost is the same. A feature that requires a physical button that isn't included in the consumer camera is a physical button not need in manufacturing....it didn't have to be tested on that model for integration with other features and the support costs for handling problems and user issues with the feature are all lower.

An illustrative example of this is zebras. Soccer moms and grand parents won't use it so why should they pay for it? Not enabling saves the user testing of having in in the menus and the support costs for all the consumers that accidently turn it on and call in because their camera is broken with wiggling stripes.

Those who appreciate and want the greater functions are the ones that should pay for it and by putting the functions in the various models, manufacturers can develop products for various markets at various price points. The costs are borne by the proper market segment while the core gets borne across all markets which helps buyers in all of them.

Ron Evans August 21st, 2012 01:27 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
I agree with you Les, however the actual price has little to do with cost and more to do with market pricing. The profit margin is a reflection of how good the R & D was in meeting its intended market. Before retiring I spent my career in high tech as both VP marketing and in R & D so I am well aware of the issues of testing both in R & D and in production.

As an example I got one of the early NX5U camcorders that both suffered the back focus issue as well as the problem with FMU128 and SD card shut downs. Both were fixed under warranty but clearly one was not tested in R & D fully and the other a manufacturing testing issue !!!

I am a Sony fan, all my cameras are Sony. NX5U, CX700, XR500, SR11 and still around but not used FX1, TRV50, HC96, TRV740. even a VX3 !!! Decks DHR1000, EV-S7000 and GV-HD700/1.

None of the current batch of cameras meet my current search for a camera that my wife can use to do closeups for our shoot that is easy to use. She currently uses the SR11, uses touch spot focus and exposure control. It is getting old and compared to the others is not as good. Low light is poor compared to the others and the exposure moves in steps. I would like a camera that has good LANC controlled variable zoom,clearly has touch spot focus and with a continuous exposure control ( no steps). Maintaining focus though zoom would be nice but that is why she uses spot focus all the time now as the SR11 will not hold focus through zooming. Why not use autofocus? Shoots are in the theatre so light changes throw off auto focus all the time. All my batteries, chargers , LANC controllers etc for Sony so a Sony is at the top of my list. If the NEX-EA50EH meets these it may well be interesting and would be an alternate to my NX5U sometimes too.

Ron Evans

Chris Barcellos August 21st, 2012 02:43 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Evans (Post 1749332)
.with features turned off as the models progress down in price. .

The R&D is clearly done on the the more complex camera and then marketing dictates the feature set for the real products.

Ron Evans

Too bad this wasn't the rule with the VG20. Nex 5n and 7n sported scene profile settings which included ability to adjust saturation, sharpness and contrast. Same with the Nex VG10. VG20 shows up, without it, while Sony advertizing actually included it. Of course, the next level up, the FS100 has it again.

Why is it missing in only one camera in the line ? It was obviously a deliberate move to protect from a threat Sony perceived and had nothing to do with higher price options.

Ron Evans August 21st, 2012 03:28 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Barcellos (Post 1749409)
Too bad this wasn't the rule with the VG20. Nex 5n and 7n sported scene profile settings which included ability to adjust saturation, sharpness and contrast. Same with the Nex VG10. VG20 shows up, without it, while Sony advertizing actually included it. Of course, the next level up, the FS100 has it again.

Why is it missing in only one camera in the line ? It was obviously a deliberate move to protect from a threat Sony perceived and had nothing to do with higher price options.

Purely marketing I expect. I am sure ALL the Sony cameras have all the capability in the on board processor. Just depends on what is decided to market ie the loaded firmware which governs what you can see in the menus etc. Certainly the older Sony's could be modified with the maintenance LANC controller and that may still be the case.

Ron Evans

Les Wilson August 21st, 2012 04:21 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Yes, Ron, we've had similar careers ... my comments were directed toward Jalan. I edited my post indicating that.

Dave Allen August 26th, 2012 03:25 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
A Different Sony NEX EA50 Promo film

Ok, so the techno music sucks!

It will be interesting to see the lens on this camera. I am not sure why it has to look odd and clunky.....the other detachable lenses on other Sony videocams are fully automatic without looking like someone tried to motorize a lens long after the fact.

Werner Graf August 27th, 2012 04:02 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Dan Chung on the camcorder...

http://www.dslrnewsshooter.com/2012/...-demonstrated/

Craig Seeman September 15th, 2012 09:05 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Price now down to $3600 at B&H
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/887069-REG/Sony_nex_ea50h_Sony_NEX_EA50_Camcorder_with.html

Lee Mullen September 16th, 2012 04:30 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Anyone know if this will shoot timelapse?

Bill Koehler September 16th, 2012 11:50 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig Seeman (Post 1753629)

I noticed that also.

To me it makes it a no-brainer to get the NEX-EA50 vs the NEX-VG30. By the time you add the XLR adapter to the NEX-VG30 you will be at almost the same price. In addition, I am betting the NEX-EA50 has the picture profiles that the NEX-VG30 lacks. And I like the fact the batteries the NEX-EA50 uses have been around a long time and are more likely to stay that way than the ones Sony sticks into their consumer cams (VG10/VG20/VG30) and periodically changes.

What I find interesting is the NEX-VG900 + XLR adapter + the Sony servo-zoom lens totals to $5K USD. As nice as FullFrame would be, I think I would wait to see the price tag on the NEX-FS100 replacement that has to be coming to support the servo-zoom lens(es).

Alister Chapman September 16th, 2012 02:35 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Koehler (Post 1753709)
I think I would wait to see the price tag on the NEX-FS100 replacement that has to be coming to support the servo-zoom lens(es).

Not sure that Sony will replace the FS100 just to support a stills lens fitted with a motor. More likely to do a firmware update along with the option to buy the hand grip from the FS700.

Do remember that the zoom lens is based on the SAL18200 so it won't track focus throughout the zoom range. You'll have to use autofcocus to hold focus as you zoom. Without the ability to adjust the back focus/flange back you can't expect a zoom to hold focus as you zoom in and out. The power zooms at IBC definitely did not hold focus manually as you zoomed. There was a pronounced focus shift as you zoomed in and out. I was told by the engineers that this would be improved, but possibly never fully eliminated. This isn't like an EX where you can defeat the focus momentarily with crash zooms, this was a noticeable shift that did not correct itself as you zoomed.

Ron Evans September 16th, 2012 09:05 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Koehler (Post 1753709)
I noticed that also.

To me it makes it a no-brainer to get the NEX-EA50 vs the NEX-VG30. By the time you add the XLR adapter to the NEX-VG30 you will be at almost the same price. In addition, I am betting the NEX-EA50 has the picture profiles that the NEX-VG30 lacks. And I like the fact the batteries the NEX-EA50 uses have been around a long time and are more likely to stay that way than the ones Sony sticks into their consumer cams (VG10/VG20/VG30) and periodically changes.

.

I tend to agree that when one adds in the cost of the bigger battery, XLR adapter and Mic, viewfinder on the LCD and likely more controls the price difference favours the NEX EA50. I just need to ensure that it has touch focus etc that makes using that zoom useful like the consumer Sony cams I now use that also do not hold focus when zooming. I also have batteries and chargers from my FX1 and NX5 as well as a FMU128 that I use with the NX5U. The combination starts to look attractive.

Ron Evans

Gabe Strong September 16th, 2012 10:30 PM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alister Chapman (Post 1753734)
Not sure that Sony will replace the FS100 just to support a stills lens fitted with a motor. More likely to do a firmware update along with the option to buy the hand grip from the FS700.

Do remember that the zoom lens is based on the SAL18200 so it won't track focus throughout the zoom range. You'll have to use autofcocus to hold focus as you zoom. Without the ability to adjust the back focus/flange back you can't expect a zoom to hold focus as you zoom in and out. The power zooms at IBC definitely did not hold focus manually as you zoomed. There was a pronounced focus shift as you zoomed in and out. I was told by the engineers that this would be improved, but possibly never fully eliminated. This isn't like an EX where you can defeat the focus momentarily with crash zooms, this was a noticeable shift that did not correct itself as you zoomed.

I hope you are right, I'd like to see that available for the FS100.

Bill Koehler September 17th, 2012 10:27 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alister Chapman (Post 1753734)
Not sure that Sony will replace the FS100 just to support a stills lens fitted with a motor. More likely to do a firmware update along with the option to buy the hand grip from the FS700.

My expectation is that Sony will also be migrating the FullFrame+APS-C capabilities similar to the Alpha99/NEX-VG900 throughout the NEX-FSxxx line, along with the zoom rocker/control. Given the relative price points, they almost have to. NAB is going to be interesting next year!

Craig Seeman September 17th, 2012 11:26 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Sony is odd about how they update products so I'm honestly not sure what to expect.

The Sony EX1r received features that never resulted in an update to the EX3.
The F3 still uses 4:2:0 internally when they started using 4:2:2 in admittedly higher end cameras but now in the new PMWs.
You'd think the FS700 features would eventually find their way into an updated F3 (slow mo for example).
The VG series starts to move into full frame.
The EA50 has a form factor some of us would like to see across the product line.
The feature progression and release just doesn't' seem logical. I can't help but think this creates confusion in the marketplace.

Alister Chapman September 18th, 2012 01:08 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig Seeman (Post 1753865)
Sony is odd about how they update products so I'm honestly not sure what to expect.

The Sony EX1r received features that never resulted in an update to the EX3.
The F3 still uses 4:2:0 internally when they started using 4:2:2 in admittedly higher end cameras but now in the new PMWs.
You'd think the FS700 features would eventually find their way into an updated F3 (slow mo for example).
The VG series starts to move into full frame.
The EA50 has a form factor some of us would like to see across the product line.
The feature progression and release just doesn't' seem logical. I can't help but think this creates confusion in the marketplace.

Nothing odd there really. You have to remember it takes Sony 3-4 years to develop a new camera and a year or more to do an updated version.

The EX1R was developed after the EX3 and included new hardware not in the EX3 so the EX3 could not be updated by firmware alone, the EX3 sold in lower numbers than the EX1/EX1R so perhaps is was felt this did not justify the cost of re-design.

The F3 development started not long after the EX1 and uses a lot of EX1 parts including the back end processing which is why it can't do 4:2:2 internally.

Maybe we will see an updated F3, there's certainly plenty of rumours flying around. The FS100 didn't come out at exactly the same time as the F3.

The EA50 does have an interesting form factor and perhaps we will see similar on other product lines. However when Sony made a full shoulder mount version of the EX1 (PMW-320) it wasn't one of their greatest hits. A lot of people don't want shoulder mounted cameras these days.

Al Yeung September 18th, 2012 07:24 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alister Chapman (Post 1753734)
Not sure that Sony will replace the FS100 just to support a stills lens fitted with a motor. More likely to do a firmware update along with the option to buy the hand grip from the FS700.

Do remember that the zoom lens is based on the SAL18200 so it won't track focus throughout the zoom range. You'll have to use autofcocus to hold focus as you zoom. Without the ability to adjust the back focus/flange back you can't expect a zoom to hold focus as you zoom in and out. The power zooms at IBC definitely did not hold focus manually as you zoomed. There was a pronounced focus shift as you zoomed in and out. I was told by the engineers that this would be improved, but possibly never fully eliminated. This isn't like an EX where you can defeat the focus momentarily with crash zooms, this was a noticeable shift that did not correct itself as you zoomed.

Curious to read about "pronounced focus shift." I had the FS100 and SEL18200 combo, and the latter always seemed to me to be parfocal more or less. Acceptably so for HD video anyway. Is the powered version the definitely SEL18200 with a motor, or rather Tamron's version (rebranded SEL18200LE) with a motor?

Craig Seeman September 20th, 2012 09:43 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alister Chapman (Post 1753960)
The EA50 does have an interesting form factor and perhaps we will see similar on other product lines. However when Sony made a full shoulder mount version of the EX1 (PMW-320) it wasn't one of their greatest hits. A lot of people don't want shoulder mounted cameras these days.

The issue with the PMW 320 is that, it's design a bit bulky. The EA50, being a smaller lighter camera base, looks like it can be used either hand held or shoulder mount. I think it's a fundamentally different approach to shoulder design than the 320. It's probably due to the small size and light weight though. The shoulder mount is in the back (not practically with a very front heavy camera) and the shoulder mount slides out. A design like that MIGHT work with FS100 or FS700 even. I think it would be harder with the F3 which would probably go the design route of the 320 which, as you note, wasn't very popular.

Ron Little September 22nd, 2012 08:45 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
I really don’t see this as a shoulder mounted camera the weight of the cam is not really on your shoulder. It is more like a stabilizer or a third point of contact.

Noa Put September 22nd, 2012 09:10 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
It's more like an Sony EX3 or the older Canon XLH1, both are also semi- shoulder camera's but not really as all the wheight is still in your hands, a friend of mine has a EX3 and he says that he can't film longer then 5 minutes handheld before it gets too heavy.

Ron Little September 22nd, 2012 10:50 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
The first time I saw the shoulder extension I thought to myself “great place to mount the Nanoflash and battery."

Alister Chapman October 1st, 2012 01:31 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Been out and about in Hong Kong shooting with a pre-production EA50 and I really quite like it. It is not an FS700 or FS100, the image quality is not quite that good. The pictures are contrasty and it's not as sensitive. It's really nice to have the same familiar menu's as the FS100 including the same picture profiles so you can dial in a look to suit your needs. The servo zoom is OK. It's not perfect, there is a picture shift when you change zoom direction and some small focus shifts (these should be significantly reduced in production units). It was really nice to have a functioning zoom on a big sensor camera. But even if you don't have a zoom lens the EA50's 2x electronic zoom works really well and I didn't notice any significant change in image quality when using the digital zoom. The camera is front heavy, but it's not a heavy weight camera so I didn't find it too bad to use. The buttons and switches are easy to access when it's on your shoulder. I missed having builtin ND filters and had to resort to using the shutter to deal with brighter scenes and there are no special functions like S&Q so no time-lapse or slow motion other than by shooting at 50p/60p and slowing it down in post. I did shoot some time lapse by just letting the camera roll and then speeding it up in post. It does have a few slow shutter speeds so I was able to use these in some of the night sequences I shot for a blurry effect. I'll be writing a longer more detailed review in due course and posting some sample clips and frame grabs.

Michael Liebergot October 1st, 2012 07:54 AM

re: New Sony NEX-EA50EH Announcement
 
Alister, how did the EA50EH hold up in low light?
I realize it won't be as clean as the FS100/700, but does it hold up well?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network