|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 25th, 2008, 04:11 PM
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
|
If one did not intend to add sharpening in post, and wanted the best out of the box, would you recommend Detail OFF, then? That's what it sounds like, but rarely tweak the sharpening in post so I am not sure.
BE |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2008, 04:27 PM
|
#17 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Steve with your detail 0 setting in the example was Frequency left at 0 also?
I have had some good luck with Detail level at -15 and Frequency at +5, in HiSAT, +25 , Cine3 or Cine4. |
|
|
|
|
January 25th, 2008, 04:29 PM
|
#18 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Viersen, Germany
Posts: 120
|
I will receive my EX1 on wednesday next week and will do some testing.
But from what I've seen so far I would say that footage with Detail=off looks more organic and less artificial/electronic. So I think I won't shoot with Detail on because it's not difficult to add some crispiness but nearly impossible to remove the artificial look. ;) regards Dennis |
|
|
|
|
January 25th, 2008, 04:37 PM
|
#19 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Thanks Dennis I look forward to your findings.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
