|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 30th, 2007, 09:37 AM | #91 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 25
|
You are right, the 743-TQ865 is not yet available from Supermicro, only announced. I verified that the 743-TQ760R is the exact same chassis except for the power supply. The redundant power supply can be removed and replaced with the power supply from the TQ865 when it becomes available if I need the extra power.
The hard drives were a bit more for the Barracuda ES series which are server class hard drives made to be run in RAID enclosures. The standard Barracudas were $119 ea. as opposed to $149 ea. A quick lookup of currency conversion: 1 euro = US $1.48 Thanks for the tip on the BIOS settings. |
November 30th, 2007, 01:02 PM | #92 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
You purchases TWO Xeon CPUs, correct? If not, that is a lot of capability going to waste. But that should be a fast system, have fun with it. I only plan to spend about $3K, but my system will definitely be XDCamEX capable. I hope you are doing something really crazy that can take advantage of the added system horsepower.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 30th, 2007, 01:07 PM | #93 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 25
|
Nope, just the one CPU for the moment. Will be adding a second later. From what I've read even though many NLE packages (PPCS3) can take advantage of up to 16 cores the second CPU won't make a dramatic difference. I may be wrong with this assumption however. And actually, I'm just impatient. Won't be doing anything too extreme. Just wanted the best system I could get within reason.
|
November 30th, 2007, 02:28 PM | #94 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
I will be honest, your configuration makes no sense to me. The only reason to get a workstation class system is for the dual CPUs, and the high bandwidth I/O slots. PCIe has negated that difference to a degree, and you aren't using any PCI-X solutions like AXIO or Xena. Why not get an LGA775 based Core2Quad system? The 8800Ultra doesn't make much sense either, unless you play games. I have an 8800GTX in my edit system, only because I got it for free, and I play BF2. It doesn't work well for editing, runs hot and loud, and doesn't support full screen video overlay.
Any reason you chose the 5440 over the 5365. The older one will be faster, you aren't taking advantage of the new faster FSB, why use the newer gear? If you aren't using the faster FSB, why get the newer MB? I mean if you have money to burn, have at it, but it doesn't make sense to me. Just my thoughts on the matter. The new 45nm CPUs are a big disappointment, so I am just going to get older gear (Woodcrest/Clovertown) for cheaper, after waiting months for the new release.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 30th, 2007, 03:54 PM | #95 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
In comparing the X5365 to the X5472 I noticed over here that they are around the same price, at least according to initial, preliminary offers. If that turns out to be the case then the increased cache (8 >> 12 MB), the increased FSB, the higher clock speed, the inclusion of SSE4 and lowered TDP make the newer generation very worthwhile.
I agree that such a server board is best used with both sockets filled. To keep costs somewhat in hand I would personally use a nVidia 8800GT card, not an Ultra. They are very close in performance but not in price. Most NLE's don't use the GPU very much, so here you can save some $$ on an otherwise very powerful and costly system. Why do you consider the Harpertown so disappointing in comparison to the Woodcrest/Clovertown? |
November 30th, 2007, 03:58 PM | #96 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Lack of availability, the increased FSB is only available on the highest models, didn't bring down prices any. I usually purchase a step or two below the top of the line (no Extreme Edition for me). Compare the 2.66Ghz version between 5300 and 5400 series and you will see what I mean.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 30th, 2007, 04:06 PM | #97 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
November 30th, 2007, 04:12 PM | #98 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Don't hold your breath. I am not saying that that is not true, but I will wait until I see an independent benchmark before I believe it. 10% is a bit more realistic, and wouldn't surprise me.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 30th, 2007, 04:22 PM | #99 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 25
|
Oh, I'm not. I'm ordering parts and building a machine. I'd say those waiting for benchmarks are holding their breath.
I simply made my post to give people in the states an idea of what was actually available and not just announced and it what it cost me to get those parts. |
November 30th, 2007, 05:07 PM | #100 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
I'm not holding my breath either. I am planning to buy an HP XW8400 today, since it is the last day for a particular deal. I am buying dual 5150s, with the plan to upgrade to 5400s once they become widely available, if I find myself needing the quad horsepower.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 30th, 2007, 11:11 PM | #101 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Quote:
|
|
December 1st, 2007, 08:01 AM | #102 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Since the Nvidia 8 series GPUs are out of the question, I'll take to my new machine the 7800GT + one new card.
Could I get some recommendations for the other card. Priorities are: 1. Full screen preview available with Prospect & CS3. 2. Render speed improvements in Magic Bullet. 3. Price approx. $300 or less. 4. HDCP support. I'm looking at the 7600GT, which is nice and cheap or the Quadro FX 570, but I don't know what the benefit of it is. |
December 1st, 2007, 12:47 PM | #103 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
As far as GPUs, the 7600GT should be cheap. Get one and try it. If you don't like it, keep it as a spare and try another one. It is hard to predict how certain combinations will work together, and if you are going to be experimenting, it makes sense to try for the cheaper solutions first.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
|
December 1st, 2007, 07:12 PM | #104 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Also, is there a 3.00GHz quad xeon in the 53xx series? I can't find one higher that 2.66GHz. The only 3.00GHz I can find is in the 54xx series, which isn't available over here yet... Also, just spoke to another guy who's doing a quote for me and he said I was insane for looking at the Xeons. He said if I could see a performance increase in 8 cores of Xeon over the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 3.00GHz he'd give me the computer! He also told me that CS3 wouldn't even use the 8 cores and that the 8800GT may have the full screen preview re-enabled, unlike other 8 series Nvidia cards. So he just confused me and I don't know what to make of his opinions... Last edited by John Hewat; December 1st, 2007 at 07:45 PM. |
|
December 2nd, 2007, 05:10 AM | #105 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|