|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 13th, 2006, 02:30 AM | #91 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 331
|
I own a powermac g5 dual 2.7ghz. This still uses pci-x, doesn't it? So there's no way for me to go for the Kona 3, right? I also own a 1.65 ghz Powerbook. I'm currently having some problems with it, maybe because I've limewire instaled. My DV playback only works in "medium" quality setting in FCP. When I select "better, it struggles and I can't get realtime. The same can be said about dvcprohd footage that I've downloaded. The Powerbook is struggling to view those files in realtime.
Maybe this is a post for another category... Anyway, just wanted to say I migrated from PC to Mac because of the HVX, too.
__________________
If you don't believe in your film, no one else will. |
January 13th, 2006, 03:01 AM | #92 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
For now, I'm thinking the smallest powerbook g4 with card slot to take around. Because my powerbook g4 12 inch was not so usefull to take around since it does not have a card slot. So, I ended up just making the backups on my iPod. My configuration would be upgraded to 15" Powerbook G4 with cardslot to take around with HVX200, PowerMac G5 Dual core with Kona 3 and Huge Fiber Raid. CinePorter or something similar for direct recording most of the time and one 8GB P2 card for quick transfering or testing purpose. |
|
January 13th, 2006, 03:39 AM | #93 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 99
|
Hi Kaku -
I think that there will be pcmcia adapters for the express slot within a month or two as there will be pcmcia fw 800 adapters for the express slot. But yeah - if you needed a Mac now, at this moment - it would be a hard choice - to say the least ... not so many options. |
January 13th, 2006, 05:03 AM | #94 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
Good, I did not have time to look around much, so nice to know that it is coming. |
|
January 13th, 2006, 10:08 AM | #95 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
January 13th, 2006, 11:43 AM | #96 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 99
|
2.7 or dp 2, 2.3, 2.5 refurb - would be a fair choice I think, Jeff. And yes, I think 1 or 2 years is a reasonable expectation for support ... more like 3 if the transition from OS 9 to X is anything to judge by.
Not to foretell doom but we are looking at new machines and a compile of the entire suite and OS ... Apple are good but any sane person would have to expect some teething issues. From a productive standpoint some will choose to wait a while. I could jump on the new stuff right now - but only because I've got backup systems. edit: IMO, of course. The only gotcha's I can see with a tower refurb is the additional investment in older tech - which may bite later on. Don't under rate the current pb's as well - they offer the "middle of the road" approach. Configure them with fw800 dual channel raid 0 and they can handle 720 easily, as well as easy p2 transfer and direct capture. If you needed to buy RIGHT NOW it's tricky - I can sympathise. Last edited by Rob McCardle; January 13th, 2006 at 12:19 PM. |
January 13th, 2006, 01:47 PM | #97 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bethel, VT
Posts: 824
|
I just think Mac has created a bit of a holding pattern for us...Man producers that is. And the same goes for my audio studio.
But the upside is that for so many users that want to jump on the new Intel wagon, there will be good deals on G5 towers and the 2.5 and 2.7 will make great HD FCP systems. It seems logical to simply stay under the radar as far as the new Intel change over, cetainly no one wants to think about Rossetta in a professional environment. I'd bet that we'll see the new Intel towers by this summer, but again, until all the supporting apps are as smooth as the current integration, why move. Especially if a last generation G5 will do everything you need. As far as the iMac is concerned, I'd do the same thing. While expansion is a dead end, the fastest iMac is a very nice little system if you can live with a 20' monitor and the limited RAM. THey do in fact hold their value, and for someone just getting into Mac could be a good interim solution while waiting the next year for the Intel transition to be complete. |
January 14th, 2006, 09:37 AM | #98 |
Posts: n/a
|
P2 - Which Ones & Why?
How many P2 cards are you guys getting and in what storage capacity?
What's your reasoning (if you don't mind me asking)? |
January 14th, 2006, 09:42 AM | #99 |
Posts: n/a
|
I was thinking of one 4gig card, then I was thinking of two.
Now I'm thinking of 2 8gig cards because of the flexibility of shooting time that combo would allow. I'm still trying to decide though. And since I have time (since I don't know when I will actually take delivery of the HVX), I thought I'd see what everyone else was doing. I have read in a few places and heard from the DVinfo.Net sponsor that I'm buying the camera from that the 8gig cards are sparse. If that's the case, I guess there's not much of a decision to make. I look forward to hearing other opinions on this subject. Especially since the new Mac Laptop was introduced at MWSF and that is no longer an unknown factor. Thank you. |
January 14th, 2006, 09:49 AM | #100 |
Go Go Godzilla
|
Hi Derek,
I've selected (2) 8GB P2 cards to get the most un-interrupted shooting time possible. I would have preferred to use the Cineporter but it doesn't look like it's going to be available in time to use it for my project. My workflow will be to fill up the P2 cards, transfer off to an external firewire drive, wipe the cards and keep shooting. Last edited by Robert Lane; January 14th, 2006 at 10:23 AM. |
January 14th, 2006, 10:36 AM | #101 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
|
|
January 14th, 2006, 10:42 AM | #102 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Posts: 1,382
|
I just began to process the 24p files to be real 24frame with the cinematool reverse telecine menu in the FCP5. It is very easy, just select the file and choose the menu. It converts the file to be real 24 frame. I believe this could be done with batch selection.
|
January 14th, 2006, 12:33 PM | #103 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
I'd recommend 4gb cards over 8gb if you can make it work. You definitely want more than one; I'd say two 4gb would be dramatically more useful than one 8gb. With just one card, as soon as it's full you have to shut down your production while offloading the contents. With two cards you can continue shooting while the other card is offloading. We did two days of dramatic narrative style shooting with just two 4gb cards and a laptop, and we never had to wait, the camera was always ready with a fresh card.
With just one card, I think you'll be not so happy. As for pricing, 4gb's just make a lot more sense. At current pricing I think you can get two 4gb's and a P2 Store for less than the cost of two 8gb's. That's four times as much storage for less cash. Not that I'm necessarily recommending the P2 Store, but if I was considering the $10,000 pricetag of cam + 2 8gb's, I'd say the $9200 pricetag of the two 4gb's and the P2 Store is a much wiser way to spend the dough (plus it's less dough!) There are two good cases to be made for going with the 8gb's. First, if you do long shots (maybe interviews) where you need to keep the camera rolling for a longer time, then yes the 8gb's make more sense than multiple 4gb's do. But, I'd say the FireStore would make more sense than either for that case, so... The second case is in offloading to a firewire drive. Offloading to a firewire drive involves creating a new partition for each card, and the system limits you to 15 partitions. If you use the camera to control a firewire drive, it limits it to 15 partitions; so for 4gb cards, that means you can offload a max. of 60gb before it's done. With 8gb cards, presumably you could go to 120gb (I haven't tested that, I don't have any 8gb's, but it seems to make sense). Of course, if you're using a laptop, these size restrictions go away, you can use the full capacity of terabyte drives if you want. In short, the 4gb's provide much more storage for the dollar; I think you can get around six 4gb cards for the price of two 8gb's. I have two 4gb cards, and I think it's serviceable for any type of dramatic narrative production; obviously for other types of uses you may have to consider other alternatives. |
January 14th, 2006, 12:51 PM | #104 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 613
|
I waver back and forth on whether I should have purchased the HVX with (6) 4GB cards, but my order was placed and committed back in Oct. So, although the price is very steep, I had decided to go with the two 8GB card package.
My reasoning is, that it will be painful enough of a transition away from the 60 minute DV tape approach for me. And at 1080 res on the HVX200, we're talking *about* 4 minutes per 4GB card. Documentary and run n' gun style eats time like crazy. With the two 8GB cards I can shoot 18 minutes worth of 1080 before offloading. Or per Barry's workflow suggestion, do the alternate card offload. So I could shoot 9 minutes worth on 1 card, remove, offload that, while shoooting 9 more on the other. Finally, with 24PN, I like knowing the combined 16GB of the two cards will allow a little over 40 minutes of 720p recording without offload or card swap. Cut that in half for the 4GB cards. So to save $$, and you don't need longer sustained recording, or no-offload-shooting style, I think the 4GB are definitely the way to go. Maybe I'll buy some 4GB cards as well! :D :D
__________________
www.holyzoo.com |
January 14th, 2006, 01:17 PM | #105 | ||
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Another thing that I like about the 8GB cards is their long term usability. I know that none of us know the future of this technology, but I would imagine a year from now we'll be seeing 16GB (and higher) P2 cards become available and at the same time prices dropping. If that's the case, I don't know how many times you would reach for a 4GB card when you could use a 8GB or 16GB? This forum is a great place to learn from others' experience and it sure does seem like in Kaku's experience of using the HVX in several settings, he likes the 8GB card(s). Quote:
|
||
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|