DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   What Happens in Vegas... (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/what-happens-vegas/)
-   -   Vegas Video discussions from 2003 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/what-happens-vegas/6105-vegas-video-discussions-2003-a.html)

Rick Forge July 15th, 2003 07:31 AM

Ed and Glen,
Thanks for the reply. Glenn- I probably didn't phrase it right but I was seeking opinions on what YOUR minimum system requirements would be for Vegas 4.0. I want to make sure that I buy enough RAM and HD and that I have all the necessary hardware to get the job done effectively. In checking turnkey system sellers I have received all sorts of opinions. This is a great site to get some much valued, unbiased information from people who are in the know. Thanks and keep the opinions coming to this editing rookie!

Rob Lohman July 15th, 2003 07:55 AM

Thanks Chris!

Glen Elliott July 15th, 2003 07:58 AM

Wow thanks- that would be great. Have Trox moderate it! ;)

Glen Elliott July 15th, 2003 08:12 AM

Well I run Vegas both on my desktop PC and laptop. It runs fine on both even despite the fact my laptop is a little aged (Pentium 1.6, 512mgs DDR, 40gig hd). The main difference I see are rendering times- a 1.6 is a bit different than 2.2 (well 1.8 I should say...with the performance of a 2.2- as AMD would say).

Ed's right though- any pre-built computer would easily be powerfull enough to run Vegas. I don't see anything slower than 2ghz nowadays. I have, however, found you can buy older/cheaper parts if you build the computer yourself. Check pricewatch.com for all the latest prices. You'd be amazed how much last-years top CPUs cost now...I paid close to $300 for my Athlon XP 2200+, it's now roughly $70-80. UGH!...it hurts to look.

If I had the money- my dream editing system would be a Nforce M.board, w/ dual Athlon 3200+, 320gig SATA raid-0, 1gig of paired DDR, Two 21" Flatscreen monitors (w/v.card that supports dual monitors), and last but not least Vegas+DVD. ;)

Nick Kerpchar July 15th, 2003 08:13 AM

Ditto to what Glen said.

Nick

Ed Smith July 15th, 2003 08:59 AM

A dedicated Vegas forum...I agree that might be useful but...

Why not a dedicated Premiere forum?

All the best,

Ed

Tor Salomonsen July 15th, 2003 09:11 AM

Well if they make a dedicated Vegas forum I suppose this would practically become a Premiere forum, if not dedicated.

Glen Elliott July 15th, 2003 10:50 AM

True true- the only two I mainly see posts on are Vegas and Premiere. With Vegas on it's own forum this one can become "Premiere, etc". ;)

Granted I like the SoFo forums and all but it can't touch the layout of this "PHB" forum format! Love it! Thanks again guys.

Stewart McDonald July 17th, 2003 03:44 PM

Converting Pal footage to 24p in Vegas
 
What steps would I go to make sure I get the best quality footage? There are many different choices in different properties and im not sure which I should be changing and which I shouldn't

Thanks

Joe Carney July 17th, 2003 05:47 PM

Now if we could get Spot and friends to leave those awful dmnforums and take up residence here....Oh well.

Glen Elliott July 17th, 2003 08:04 PM

Spot is on DMN forums? Where is DMN?

Michael Wisniewski July 17th, 2003 08:16 PM

DMN Forums - see the Sonic Foundry Vegas forum

I agree I like this forum software so much better. Though the DMN forums do have some very good groups and information.

Tor Salomonsen July 18th, 2003 02:09 AM

Your first step should be to read (and possibly re-read) the Sonic Foundry 24p paper

Stewart McDonald July 18th, 2003 02:28 AM

Thanks, that helped quite a bit, but still didn't tell me how to convert Pal to 24p.
Does Magic Bullet do this?

Thanks

Peter Moore July 18th, 2003 08:45 AM

Conversion from 25 to 24p is nothing more than changing the frame rate and slowing down the sound 4%. You can definitely do this in premier / after effects "Interpret Footage" option but I don't know if Vegas has something like that.

Edward Troxel July 18th, 2003 09:40 AM

Vegas should handle it fine.

Peter Moore July 18th, 2003 11:48 AM

Where is the option in Vegas to reinterpret the frame rate?

Edward Troxel July 18th, 2003 12:11 PM

File - Render As - Pick your format.

Glen Elliott July 18th, 2003 05:27 PM

Editing PAL to NTSC on Vegas
 
I have a friend that lives overseas he wants me to edit his raw footage for him for distribution. He's going to send the footage over as DV AVI (PAL) on several DVD discs.
I'm looking to move the footage on to my hd edit in Vegas and output the project as MPG2.

To my knowledge PAL DVD players can play PAL and NTSC, but NTSC DVD players only play NTSC. Is this true?

If so is there a way to import the PAL footage into Vegas, edit it, then output it as NTSC MPG2?

Peter Jefferson July 20th, 2003 02:57 AM

What would be a good tool for a "see thru" border?

borders and cutters work well, however i havent had any success blurring out the edges to create a borderless pic in pic effect...
i can blur it black or any other colour, but to completely REMOVE the edges is what im after (bit like the canopus pic in pic defaults)

any ideas?

Robert Poulton July 20th, 2003 03:37 AM

Peter,
Do you want to overlay the video with effect to another video? because if not you might just want to use photoshop.

you might be able to use an image mask from photoshop in vegas. It should work.


Rob:D

Peter Jefferson July 20th, 2003 05:38 AM

basically, im using the 3d fly away transition for slideshows, but im tryin to soften the edge as it flis away, basically turning into a dot as it flips....

Im also trying to cut out some edges as i run pic in pic routines within the slideshow.
Im using lots of track motions etc heavily filtered and effected...
Im really over the square look and lines.. and jsut want to fade out the edges of some faces

basically im using the same image on 2 tracks, the panoramic image, then a zoomed close up of the faces within the pic in pic thingy.. both tracks are constantly moving and changing image and it works real well, but the edges on the photos dont give it that finished polished look...

Jeff Jordan July 20th, 2003 07:10 PM

NLE using Vegas + DVD authoring
 
Hi folks,

Will be ordering my GL2 next week, and I am also new NLE, having been a Canon 35mm and digital SLR shooter for about 20 years.

My intention with the camera will be completely amateur, personal use. I have a couple of questions for the experienced folks here will to help a neophyte out.

I have been reading all the posts here I can find regarding NLE and getting "real time" rendering by using very high end video boards(Matrox, Canopus TRex, etc), and oodles of HD space.

I have a Dell 1.8 Ghz with 512 MB Ram and a Geforce 128mb TI4600 video card. I have about 60GB of ATA disk, and a 1394 fire wire board.

From everything I have read, it appears that Vegas is the premier(no pun intended) editing tool for both video and audio. I plan on getting the version with DVD authoring for when I eventually get a DVD burner.

My question: Am I in for a shock as to how long my rendering times are going to be? I understand Vegas works really well on "standard" off the shelf PC configs, so I think I am ok in the editing area. Just wondering if I am in for long waits and surprises in the post-editing area with my existing hardware platform.

thanks so much for an assistance.

Jeff

Glen Elliott July 20th, 2003 08:35 PM

Other than the obvious including cpu speed, etc- editing times vary greatly depending on how large a render your doing and how complex it is effects, transitions, etc.

A 1.8 isn't the blazing fastest cpu around but it's no slouch either. I'm running an Athlon 2200+ which actually runs at a clock speed of 1.8ghz. To render a 1 hour project into MPG2 format it takes roughly 2 hours.

The cards you mentioned definitly have the advantage to show your changes in footage (ie transitions, effects) immediatly, however I still think they have to render, albiet possibly with hard-ware support which can make it much faster. Although all those cards support Premiere- in my humble opinion it's not worth working with Premiere even with the added benefit of hardware support. I stick to my slower encoding times and Vegas+DVD workflow. Besides long renders give me a chance to take a break- get and go get something to eat or stretch. Everyone knows the lock-knee feeling standing up after several hours in front of the computer editing. lol

Hopefully Sony will produce some sorta mack-daddy hw card to work with Vegas. One can only dream!

Don Bloom July 20th, 2003 09:39 PM

I use a P4 3.06HT and for a typical 1 hour wedding video with the effects, PIP,color correction,borders, transitions, audio enhancement, music etc,etcetc, it takes about 2 hours to render to PTT. I go do something else then, eat, say Hi to my wife, kiss my dog, or work on another machine and keep editing (which is what I do lots of now-my mid year crunch).
I really don't like the wait but I love what Vegas can do.
Don B.

Edward Troxel July 20th, 2003 10:33 PM

The border effect should work fine. Just apply the border effect, choose the blurred preset, and adjust the size of the border.

Peter Jefferson July 21st, 2003 04:44 AM

tried that ... :(

border comes out blurred but black, and as far as i can see the colour bars dont allow have alpha... jsut solid colours... :( :(

Glen Elliott July 21st, 2003 05:09 AM

No one knows?! C'mon guys don't let me down....

Adrian Douglas July 21st, 2003 06:04 AM

Glen,

As Vegas is software based and not hardware based importing and editing shouldn't be a problem. It's when you come to exporting that could be a problem. NLE PAL-NTSC conversions aren't the best quality available, they're OK for personal stuff but certainly not broadcastable. I've done it with Quicktime and the results weren't too bad, occasional artifacts in fast motion sequences. As for exporting as MPG2, I'd convert first as native DV then export as an MPG2 file.

Glen Elliott July 21st, 2003 08:43 AM

So say if I transport the native PAL DV footage to my computer (from numerous DVDs) edit it in a PAL template, then I can actually export as NTSC DV AVI before encoding to MPG2. In other words it's both 1.possible and 2. advisable to export my edited PAL footage to NTSC DV AVI format before encoding for MPG2?

This is something I've never attempted- I've always kept the workflow totaly in NTSC...so I've never tried to switch format halfway through my workflow. Hopefully it'll allow it....without the "artifacting" you spoke of.

Chris Hurd July 21st, 2003 08:57 AM

Spot is on DMN because they're paying him to be there. Do you think I should make a counter-offer? We already have so many talented folks right here who should be paid. At any rate, you asked, so you receive... welcome to DV Info's new Vegas forum. Hope this helps,

Ed Smith July 21st, 2003 09:02 AM

Hey.. What about Premiere?

Ed

Chris Hurd July 21st, 2003 09:07 AM

If there's enough demand by a number of our members, and if there's someone talented enough to volunteer to moderate it, then sure, we can start a Premiere-specific forum. Or Final Cut, or Edition, or any flavor of video editing app. Hope this helps,

Edward Troxel July 21st, 2003 09:15 AM

Actually, the borders SHOULD be alpha. Place a solid color generated media BELOW the bordered clip. You should then see that color as the border.

Adrian Douglas July 21st, 2003 10:01 AM

There's a number of different ways to convert from PAL to NTSC without spending money. The first is to export your edited PAL project as an NTSC AVI. I haven't got Vegas handy at the moment but I think there is an option to resample or something like that, make sure it is checked.

Another way is to export you project as a PAL AVI and then convert to NTSC using Quicktime PRO if you have it.

I've tried both and had success with both to various degrees, but neither of them was what I would call broadcastable.

Glen Elliott July 21st, 2003 11:14 AM

So no matter what- when I convert PAL to NTSC I'll lose quality one way or another. I mean it makes sense- it not only runs on a different frame-rate, it has a different resolution.
So it's proabably best to stay within whatever format the source material started as, if possible. The only reason I needed to possibly convert to NTSC is because it's the only way to create DVD discs that were univeraly compatable.

How about MPG1s? If I edit the source PAL material and export as several MPG1 files is there any format incompatabilities? Do you even have to specify PAL or NTSC when encoding a simple MPG?

Peter Jefferson July 21st, 2003 11:27 AM

found an easier solution.. using the Border effect gives a solid colour.. but using the cookie cutter on the overlaid track works beautifully :)

just pic the cut away all but section, adjust the size, and voila works a charm!

Edward Troxel July 21st, 2003 11:48 AM

You are bound to lose a little quality simply because you are going from 25fps to 30fps. Where do the extra 5 frames come from? They have to be "created".

Edward Troxel July 21st, 2003 11:49 AM

Yes, either Border or Cookie Cutter should work well over a generated media color. Cookie Cutter will give more control as to shape, size, and position.

Glen Elliott July 21st, 2003 12:05 PM

Edward, is what I heard true regarding PAL players handling NTSC fine? Also any definitive info regarding outputting edited PAL footage as MPG1. When dealing with MPG1 media formats don't matter in regards to PC playback...correct.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network