View Full Version : Homemade 35mm Adapter


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Daniel Moloko
December 26th, 2003, 12:43 PM
I got my first Job with the COLONIA35MM

the adapter i just made myself.

go to the site www.bobflash.com.br

choose the city RECIFE-PE

on the site theres a session called BOBCAM, where i go to parties and film everything.

check out the two last clips from a xmas party. i made the two with the 35mm lens, 50mm, 1.4.

it is wonderful, altought i had some problems to focus, with the light of the place, etc. im still learning. and i was drunk too, etc...anyway, tell me what you think of it.

im just waiting your review.

thanks

ciao

all static is the way.!!!!!

ciao

Corey Smith
December 26th, 2003, 12:58 PM
Daniel, do you know where I can get the type of ground glass you're using or what it's called?

The camera I'm using will be VERY hard to have a spinning CD. Thanks, Corey

Daniel Moloko
December 26th, 2003, 01:02 PM
It is a gg from an old zenit photocam.

clean, without anything. i think the fresnel that comes attached to it its the best thing ever. makes the diference.

ciao

Corey Smith
December 26th, 2003, 01:23 PM
Do you have any idea which model? If not, could you maybe post a photo of the camera so if someone were to find it online it would be easier to identify by sight? Thanks, Corey

Daniel Moloko
December 26th, 2003, 01:26 PM
i will help everyone in here.

for sure.

on moday i will go to the same store and buy ALL gg from these cameras.

the guy from the store has a lot of them, they are old.

they are silver.

i will send a pic to everyone.

ciao

Corey Smith
December 26th, 2003, 01:36 PM
Thanks for replying so quickly. I knew there had to be some sort of grainless type ground glass out there. I know the movietube thing coming out uses a non moving grainless ground glass from what they told me in an email. This will be so much better than having to use moving parts.

I have a question about it though. How is the brightness? I'm guessing it's probably better than using a CD. Corey

Daniel Moloko
December 26th, 2003, 01:41 PM
brightness?

i think i loose 1 f stop by the way.

dont know excatly.

and if i close the 35mm lens exposure to 4f , it gets dark and i can see the ground grass a little. so im using the lens all opened to 1.4f and adjust the exposure in the TRV18, so i dont get any grain at all, even if i close all the exposure.

sometimes i just cant believe it...

i just have to grip the box so i dont vibrate when focusing

ciao

Bob Hart
December 26th, 2003, 08:34 PM
Have experimented with a microscope slide using loose aluminium oxide grit 600 grade lapped on a sheet of glass. Glass is a much more controllable medium to work with than the CD disks which seem to get injured at the drop of a hat. The result across the glass is also totally consistent.

For those thinking of the fixed glass option and can't get the Zenit screens, the microscope slides are almost 16:9 frame. Used with a large or medium format camera lens and videoing the larger image across the whole slide, you could look forward to a good blemish-free result. I'm not sure how good the light from the lens will be as the image is spread over a larger area thus dimmer.

The frosting texture with 600 grade aluminium oxide might still be a bit course but the light transmission is heaps better than the plastic CD lapped with the 600 or pressed with 600 grade silicone carbide paper. With glass, the frosted surface is not injured by encounters with finger sweat or cleaning cloth.

Bob Hart
December 27th, 2003, 06:07 AM
Have tried the new groundglass as a stationary screen. Method = Pringles chip can, slots for glass slide to fit through it. PD150 videocam, with close up lenses x4 + x2 + x1 stacked, looking in from one end, 55mm Nikon f3.8 lens in other. Lens is crudely secured in end by rolled up sock cuff, video camera secured in end by rolled up sock cuff (True, the socks did have no heels left - honest and were washed).

In bright daylight which would require f16-f22 with ASA 320, the Nikon lens wide open, there does not appear to be any difference in the quality of the image at centre from that of image into PD150 direct. Contrast and colours remain the same though blue seems perhaps a little truer. This effect is reminiscent of late seventies 16mm Agfa neg stock.

There seems to be a slight diffusion of highlights. White objects like a flying moth seem a bit fuzzy.

There is a bit of a hotspot over 80% of the image from centre with the corners seeming about two f-stops darker.

Granularity becomes apparent in these darker corners. If the Nikon lens is stopped down, the granularity becomes apparent across the screen. The dark corners might be because I can not zoom close enough to the screen before focus crashes in the last 10% of the zoom range and I am covering an area larger than the 35mm camera frame.

There is a greater depth of field effect but nothing I cannot replicate with a close-up lens on the DP150 direct. However with a close-up lens, one cannot pull focus to infinity, so there is the bonus to using the Agus35 principle.

The PD150 will tolerate being operated upside down and the viewfinder can be positioned to display correctly if the combination is used at waist height like an old-fashioned box Brownie or medium format camera with top window viewfinders. With the eyepiece jammed into the stomach, the whole thing can be held quite steady. (An ample gut helps).

Bob Hart
December 27th, 2003, 08:39 PM
In low light levels, with the 600 grit fixed groundglass, I have shot a couple of comparative tests also one test in good light. I'll send these images to kennelmaster Chris to see if he can post them.

The groundglass test pattern seems softer yet on closer inspection, resolution seems to be the same across both test patterns in poor light. The groundglass image is about a half-stop darker, a slight lowering of contrast and there is a faint fawn coloured tint.

Camera gain was left on automatic for the low-light tests. It's probably not a valid test except it might be more representative of practical low-light conditions where you want every bit of gain you can get. Defects on the groundglass visible in strong light were not apparent in low light.

Some slightly darker streaks were apparent in some of the bright light images. These came from oils in the can lining from the crisps it once contained.

Dressing the groundglass surface with a hint of some sort of oil or wax might be an option for better contrast. The oily bits seem to contain light spill from adjacent areas.

Nicholi Brossia
December 27th, 2003, 10:43 PM
I read on the large format camera forum that one thing to do is smear vasoline on the ground side of the glass, then wipe clean with a soft, smooth cloth. The vasoline will fill in the holes and provide a "wet" look to the glass, and improve brightness. I haven't personally tested it, but it might be worth a try.

Richard James
December 27th, 2003, 11:13 PM
Just read all 41 pages in a row:D

Looks great...
Has anyone made an adapter for the GL2/XM2? would love to see some footage made with the agus35 and the GL2, and even better, the GL2 in frame mode with the agus35:D.

Chris, you said a few weeks ago you were going to make a agus35 for your GL2, i was just wondering how its going?

Thanks:)

Devin Doyle
December 28th, 2003, 09:56 AM
Richard, claps to you for doing your homework! Some people drop in on the last few pages and ask questions that have already been answered - like this thread needs to be any longer! I've been working on an adapter for my GL1 and have recently gotten my camera back from the canon repair shop. Come early next week (Tues/Weds) I should have some test footage up with the traditional design - 50mm lens > fresnel > spinning frosted cd > macro lens > camera. I'll be sure to post pics and other info....I've also been on the hunt for someone who's made an adapter for the GL1/2!

Jim Lafferty
December 28th, 2003, 01:34 PM
GREAT NEWS!

I've discovered where to get pre-frosted CDR's like Agus uses -- Maxell's 48x/700mb 50 spindle has it!

I found this on sale at Tower Records today ($15.99), and since I just ripped the label in order to open the pack, here's an idea of what it looks like:

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/frosted.jpg

- jim

John Gaspain
December 28th, 2003, 01:45 PM
<<<-- Originally posted by Jim Lafferty : GREAT NEWS!

I've discovered where to get pre-frosted CDR's like Agus uses -- Maxell's 48x/700mb 50 spindle has it!

I found this on sale at Tower Records today ($15.99), and since I just ripped the label in order to open the pack, here's an idea of what it looks like:

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/frosted.jpg

- jim -->>>

Great news!...now Im gonna have 200+ CDR's laying around.... ;)

Richard James
December 28th, 2003, 04:09 PM
Thanks Devin, Look foward to seeing your final design and footage:D

Jim Lafferty
December 28th, 2003, 07:48 PM
Daniel,

Are these the clips you speak of at bobflash.com.br:

Clip 1 (http://www.bobflash.com.br/franquias/recife/bobcam/download.php?file=bobcam-natalbarrozo-01.wmv)

(bobcam-natalbarrozo-01.wmv -- 4.07mb)

Clip 2 (http://www.bobflash.com.br/franquias/recife/bobcam/download.php?file=bobcam-natalbarrozo-02.wmv)

(bobcam-natalbarrozo-02.wmv -- 3.47mb)

?

For future reference -- when posting clips, please include the file name and/or size in your post -- that way we know we're getting the right material.

- jim

Bob Hart
December 28th, 2003, 08:11 PM
If having trouble getting the CD disk to run true, three solutions - (1) Use the whole of the CD spindle system including the pressure plate which clamps from the opposite side. This is supposed to let the CD find its correct position through gyro effect with the inner hub acting more like a clutch and centre rather than an alignment. The motor remains hard mounted. (

2) If this can't be done because of limited space and you have to mount the CD rigidly to the spindle, try making a diaphragm mount for the motor if the motor is of face-mount Mabuchi style construction. Make a little thin disk or square out of something really light and pliable. Shim steel would be best. Ice cream or milk container is okay but it will deform out of position in time. Face-mount the motor to this. You'll need to be able to precisely drill 4 holes through it, one for the motor spindle shaft, three for the screws.

( A quick and dirty cheat for making a template is to place an identical motor face down on the platen of a scanner or photocopier. The spindle shaft will have to have been removed though some photocopiers or scanners will accurately scan an object up to half an inch away from the platen. - So you'll probably have to have a second motor to dismantle for this. Slide-tray CD players often
have similar motors for tray and transport drives so these could be used. Print the scan and check the distance between the holes against the motor. Glue the print to the metal or plastic you want to drill, mark or centrepunch through the paper then drill through it. Printing to a sticky label makes the job even easier.) Mount the plate or glue it to the case. When the CD runs up to speed and straightens out, the motor will be seen to be vibrating slightly.

(3) Make a foam rubber sock out of hotwater pipe
insulation. Fix your spindle motor inside this and mount the foam inside a piece of plastic pipe glued to the case. It may be harder to keep the motor is position though as the material will slump in time.

Bob Hart
December 29th, 2003, 06:08 AM
For Aussie visitors, with Chris kennelmaster's help, there may soon be a .jpg of a partly assembled early prototype of the Agus35 non-inverter rotary groundglass principle, using Australian standard PVC plumbing bits for case and lens tube structure, plus a Decor potplant saucer as a soft motor mount. (Yes the sock will be there).

Once the motor and disk image plane positions have been tied down by testing, the lens tube will be shortened to accept a proper lens mount for the objective lens and some sort of attachment, probably 58mm filter thread for the PD150 at the other.

There will be observed a cut-out in the lens tube insude the enclosure. This provides assembly clearance for the motor and disk mount which clips into place. The enclosure case comprises two riser caps and a short piece of pipe inside one purely as an internal guide sleeve for case assembly.

The disk sits ahead of the orange saucer driven by the motor mounted behind - not fitted in this illustration. The battery holder will fit in the rear enclosure with the motor and the switch will be mounted to the rear cover which will be the removable cover for maintenance.

Fixing of the covers will be by long pillar nuts and screws as used to mount circuit boards.

Zac Stein
December 29th, 2003, 08:26 AM
bob sounds great... looking forward to seeing it.

I have some webspace, just email me zac@mindfreeproductions.com

Zac

Daniel Moloko
December 29th, 2003, 12:52 PM
yeah,

these are the clips

i just told about the clips, xmas ones, 24th ones.

thanks

ciao

Chris Hurd
December 29th, 2003, 12:58 PM
Bob Hart's images now online at www.dvinfo.net/media/hart.

By the way, I've finally edited a boiled-down version of this thread which you can read at http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?s=&threadid=18950 -- but continue to post responses to this one, please.

The edited version has been chopped down to about half the size of the original, but if anyone sees more stuff in it that can afford to go away, please let me know. Hope this helps,

Bob Hart
December 29th, 2003, 08:16 PM
In relation to using fibre-optics for image inversion I enquired with Electrophysics Corporation in the US who make the Astroscope line of camcorder image intensifiers and have received advice which indicates fibre-optics would not suit our application.

Their representatvie was most co-operative and gave a prompt response even though I was not in the market for their product.

An extract follows :-

"""
Clearly the prism/mirror approach would be lower cost and better performance. There is no existing production of image twisters having 35mm format. In addition, performance will be degraded in several areas:

1) There will be a significant reduction in effective F-number from the coherent fiber bundle (they usually have about 30% transmission);

2) Resolution (MTF) will be significantly reduced due to the limited size of each fiber;

3) They will be costly.

""""
(End quote).

Therefore, it's back to the lenses, mirrors and prisms. Well it was worth a thought.

Nicholi Brossia
December 29th, 2003, 10:14 PM
Wow, that's really cool that they were so informative.

Jim Lafferty
December 30th, 2003, 10:22 AM
For those of you who are looking to build an Agus35 for your GL1/GL2, I'm in the final stages of mine (read: sanding epoxy down and applying the last coat of black paint).

I had it up and running a moment ago and the image is stunning -- the pre-frosted disc makes all the difference in the world, and using a CD motor makes this quieter than a whisper.

Here are the pics:

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/final/front.jpg

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/final/rear.jpg

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/final/motor.jpg

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/final/disc.jpg

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/final/full1.jpg

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/final/full2.jpg

Footage up later today.

- jim

Agus Casse
December 30th, 2003, 02:44 PM
<<<-- Originally posted by Jim Lafferty : GREAT NEWS!

I've discovered where to get pre-frosted CDR's like Agus uses -- Maxell's 48x/700mb 50 spindle has it!

I found this on sale at Tower Records today ($15.99), and since I just ripped the label in order to open the pack, here's an idea of what it looks like:

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/frosted.jpg

- jim -->>>

Hey there Jim, i bought the same spindle,but the label is green, and unfortunaly it didnt came with the frosted CD inside...

Try up finding the blue label ones instead.

Agus Casse

Jim Lafferty
December 30th, 2003, 03:37 PM
The label on mine was blue with a green tint -- sort of a deep aqua. Dunno why yours didn't have a frosted CD? I'll pick up another spindle next week and let you know.

- jim

Jim Lafferty
December 30th, 2003, 11:11 PM
Well, I thought I'd have footage up tonight, but I've just come home and there's a long render ahead. It's 12am and someone's waiting upstairs for me :)

However, as proof of the improved imagery I've grabbed some full-res stills from the footage I shot around the house today. Be aware that it is not "well lit," and was intentionally so -- I wanted to see what the adapter would produce under "normal" circumstances.

Also, there can be seen some minor vignetting in a shot or two -- this is because my adapter is still without a rail setup and consequently there is noticable movement when the focus ring is adjusted on the 50mm lens -- the adapter will occasionally slip out of alignment, bringing vignetting into view. Hopefully I'll have the rod setup done by week's end.

This room is lit by minor exterior light and two 60 watt bulbs. I shot it at 1/60th, f/2.0 on my GL1, with gain set to 6 (yes, I'm aware of grain produced...)

Here you go:

http://ideaspora.net/agus35/teststills/

- jim

Agus Casse
December 31st, 2003, 01:38 AM
Those looks really nice, dont worry about the grain and lowlight... if you light up more the scene, you will be able to reduce it, same happens with the TRV18, i need to put it like 5-6 steps before the max exposure to get some low grain image.

Also, you can underexposure and then light it up in post.

David Mesloh
December 31st, 2003, 02:58 AM
Hi all, I just started reading this thread so I apologize if this has been brought up already.

There is an optical concept where if you wave a stick up and down very quickly with your hand and wrist (like swatting a fly)you can project an image on the plane that the stick passes through. the image appears to be visible in mid-air. My observation is that if you had 2 or maybe 4 propeller-like white arms at 90 or 180 degrees to each other, and had them spinning fast enough, the image would appear on the plane where the arms were spinning. An easy way to test this yourself is to take a slide projector or LCD projector or film projector and hold a piece of paper about 5 feet in front of the lens and focus the image on it. Then remove the paper and while moving the stick up and down rapidly, you will see the image where the paper used to be. The optical principal is called Persistence of Vision.

I will attach the sicence part of this as JPEG's for chris to post.

David Mesloh
just lurking on this one.

I'll attach

Peter Sciretta
December 31st, 2003, 10:16 AM
Found the frosted CD in the same maxell 50 pack at my local STAPLES... they had a ton of Maxcell cd packs... this rang in at 9.99... for 50 cds, thats not a bad deal anyways

below is a link to a better picture of the packaging and cd(s)

http://www.orfilms.com/cd.jpg

Jon Yurek
December 31st, 2003, 11:05 AM
Then remove the paper and while moving the stick up and down rapidly, you will see the image where the paper used to be. The optical principal is called Persistence of Vision.

The problem with this is that it's not so much generated by light in and of itself, it's because of the way your eyes work. Meaning, it wouldn't really help with what we're trying to do. A camera CCD and your eye don't work in quite the same way. Also, if you tried the spinning shutter like you mentioned, all you would end up with is a very flickery picture since the response time for bright lights is much faster on the CCD than it is for your eye, which is what creates the persistence effect.

Brandt Wilson
December 31st, 2003, 12:05 PM
...was the grain in your images due to the frosted plastic, or to the gain in your GL1?

Jim Lafferty
December 31st, 2003, 12:59 PM
Probably low-light and gain. I'll start really running my setup through its paces once I've got my rod assembly up and running.

- jim

Peter Sciretta
December 31st, 2003, 01:52 PM
Jim Lafferty...

What are you using to magnify the frosted cd?

Danny Tan
December 31st, 2003, 02:09 PM
hey jim, do you think you can post pictures of how you are attaching the cd spindle to your GL1? i also have the same camera and was wondering the shape you cutted out.. thx

Richard James
December 31st, 2003, 02:40 PM
Your shots look good on your gl1 jim, i look foward to making an adapter when i get hold of my GL2/(XM2).

Look foward to seeing some footage still!:)

Agus Casse
December 31st, 2003, 02:42 PM
Ok, so maxell with bluel label have frosted cds, are they 50 packs, be careful, i bought the GREEN pack, and it didnt have one.

Richard James
December 31st, 2003, 02:42 PM
Oh and Happy new year to all! (when it comes) :)

Agus Casse
December 31st, 2003, 02:57 PM
Happy New YEAR ! from Guatemala to all the world!!

Danny Tan
December 31st, 2003, 06:21 PM
my attempt at the agus35...failed miserably. i have a GL1 and people who have the gl1/2 or have seen it knows that it's lense head is extremely big and odd shaped so it is harder for it to in the cd spindle and align it with the SLR lense with the cd motor being in the middle. i finally managed to get it somewhat aligned but my ground glass made everything blurry and you cant see anything. it is just extremely blurred. i used 400 grit sandpaper to sand it maybe that is why, but i saw a sample video of some1 who used 300 grit and it came out. so i took the ground glass out and just tried it without it. so my setup was SLR Lense -> Fresnel Lense -> Canon GL1 Lense

here is the video.
www.metafilms.net/upload_files/agus35failed.avi 3.5mb

my question is for Jim lafferty since he was succesful with making the agus35 with the gl1 or whoever can answer my questions. how would i fill the entire screen or most of it instead of that small round circle seen in the video? is that where the ground glass comes in? do i need to put the camera lense closer to the SLR lense? in the video, it was about 2.5 inches from the SLR lense. Jim, can post a good guide for making it for the GL1/2 and some good pictures? thx

Bob Hart
December 31st, 2003, 07:45 PM
Danny.

You might investigate using larger diameter sewer pipe caps for your CD disk enclosure. Use a smaller diameter plastic pipe (about 62mm OD) for a lens tube and make that one piece all the way through with a larger cutout where the lens tube is inside the CD enclosure to allow for the CD and space enough to move it around when mounting it so you don't scratch it. Unfortunately I don't know the US standards so can't give you any more detail. The riser/end caps I have chosen are wide enough that the lens tube will go right through without the need to cut the outer edge. This allows the thing to be stronger and for the front lens and camcorder lens centrelines to be kept lined up. For the Canon camcorder, you may be able to find in the hardware stores PVC pipe adapters which enable different diameter pipes to be joined. One of these may enable you to clear the outer diameter of your Canon lens.

To jig the thing for tests make the lens tube longer than you will eventually need and stuff your SLR lens down inside with a cut down sock or cardboard packing rolled up around it. Not all lenses are going to fit down there so you may have to use another mounting method. If the lens fits in the tube, you'll have to slide the lens back and forth to get focus as you won't be able to get at the focus ring until you refine things furthur down the track.

As for the 400 grit sandpaper, you may have already ruined your CD disk. You could try using some Ajax or Jif (Australian brands - white stuff as a liquid or dry powder) abrasive powder cleanser in water on a sheet of glass to rub it around on to dress it down a bit but the deep scratches will probably endure. You can get good results with a new disk with 600 grade aluminium oxide loose powder. You need to be exceptionally careful to keep the working surfaces clean from any other bits of dirt and to be very patient and not press down on the disk too hard. Keep the orbits very small when you move the disk over the glass. The outer rim of the disk is raised and you will find this has to wear down first before you get any finish on the rest of the surface.

An excessively opaque CD disk can also be re-stored a little by simply polishing for a few minutes on a flat surface covered by dry soft cloth.

To test if your camcorder lens can focus on the 35mm image, find a postage stamp or barcode on some groceries and see if you can get sharp focus and frame on that.

Bob Hart
January 1st, 2004, 05:43 AM
Just a quick note if anyone is making diaphragm or other compliant mountings for their CD spindle motors to deal with shimmer from the disks running out.

You will need to include some sort of limitation on the range of movement. I have discovered the CD acts like a gyro and moves off the focal plane momentarily if you get too athletic with the Agus35 if it is built this way.

I have sent to Chris some captioned .jpg files of the first tests with rotary groundglass (CD) including a comparison pair. The groundglass was a poor specimen with deep scratches in it.

Hopefully if there is time he may post them sometime soon.

Gabor Lacza
January 1st, 2004, 11:27 AM
Is this home made adapter will also be good for the HD10U or it is a stupid question ?? I am still new...and learning...

Jim Lafferty
January 1st, 2004, 01:56 PM
What are you using to magnify the frosted cd?

A +7 achromatic diopter from Century Optics. I've found the fresnel unnecessary in my setup, and in fact prohibitive -- as with any of these projects, simplification is very important in making something simply functional.

hey jim, do you think you can post pictures of how you are attaching the cd spindle to your GL1?

I think you're referring to what connects the rear of the adapter to the front of my GL1's macro lens? If that's correct, I'm using half of a rubber coupling from Home Depot. This is what Bob mentions for connecting two lengths of PVC together -- at Home Depot they've got them as rubber tubing, in different diameters, surrounded by metal and adjustable metal straps.

I just separated the rubber from the metal on a "3 inch to 3 inch" coupler and cut it down to size with garden shears (cutting it in half along its depth, and shaving off about three inches from its circumference).

I also had to place a notch in the rubber to allow it to pass over the rear of my CD motor at the back of the spindle.

It's mounted to the CD spindle with epoxy, but notice that when you do this, a small bit of light can spill through where the epoxy rests between the spindle and the rubber tubing, so you will need to paint over it.

I used matte-black, quick-dry spray paint for my adapter -- I first sanded down both sides of the spindle and applied two coats of paint on both the inside and outside.

A rubber cup is a good choice for some reasons, a poor choice for others -- namely, it will allow your adapter some unwanted freedom of movement, and without a rail system your images will look shakey. For this reason, I'd recommend looking for some sort of solid ring setup, but I didn't know it at the time that I made mine and so I'm working on a rail system to offset the shakes.

i finally managed to get it somewhat aligned but my ground glass made everything blurry and you cant see anything. it is just extremely blurred.

You've got you flange focal length wrong, most likely. A proper FFL is the distance between the rear of your film lens, and the focal plane the image needs to be suspended on (in our case, the spinning, frosted CD). Without it, you will never be able to get focus.

Proper focal length can be gotten a variety of ways -- go back to the camera you got your lens from and measure the distance from where the lens mount is, and where the exposed film rests; or, thanks to Helen, just check the chart she linked to a few pages back (do a search above for her name and/or "flange focal")

Once you've determined proper FFL, you must then establish this exact distance between your lens and frosted CD. For example, the proper FFL for a Nikon F series lens is 1.83 inches.

how would i fill the entire screen or most of it instead of that small round circle seen in the video?

You need to attach a macro lens or filter to your GL1 of at least a +7 power. Make sure it's zoom-through capable. Century Optics +7 achromatic diopter works great, but is costly ($210).

Jim, can post a good guide for making it for the GL1/2 and some good pictures? thx

I'm working on it, along with working a fulltime job and seeking filmmaking grants -- it should be up, honestly, in about two weeks :)

- jim

Nicholi Brossia
January 1st, 2004, 02:02 PM
That's actually a tough question Gabor. Since the HD10U has higher resolution, you'll probably need a more grainless ground glass. Everyone so far, as far as I know, has been using standard definition/resolution cameras. Spinning the ground glass causes the grain to "disappear" but may not work as easily with yours.
Currently on this thread http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?s=&threadid=18690&perpage=15&pagenumber=5 we are discussing how to make a ground glass that doesn't have to spin. Vendible has gone all the way down to 3 micron ground glass (the equivalent to 8,000 grit!) and the grain is still visible, so I'm sure that would look bad on yours... but its certainly worth experimenting. Right Vendible is experimenting with a coating that hopefully will allow grainless glass and might work great with your camera.

Peter Sciretta
January 1st, 2004, 04:28 PM
Agus -

Have you/ can you use a zoom lens with the adapter... and what kind of f stop have you tried, and has it hurt you in light levels?

Peter

Daniel Moloko
January 1st, 2004, 06:12 PM
why u people ignore my adaptor?

it worked great, without any grain, etc. no spining cd or else.

i will adapt it for my new HD10u

and it will work.

vendi is trying to make his gg by himself.

i just got a zenit GG from an old photo cam. theres no grain in it.

and i think it will work better with the jvc hdv camcorder.

ciao

Filip Kovcin
January 1st, 2004, 06:49 PM
Daniel,

i think that no one is ignoring your GG. simply. it's hard to find.
you "promised" to tell us from which model this grainless GG is taken, but - no info. a few days ago i went to huge secondhand photo market here in warsaw, but i didn't find zenit with proper GG. i tested many zenits: zenit E. zenit B. zenit 11, zenit 12, zenit 122, zenit ET, zenit TTL... but no luck.
i know that not all of them are old, but i just tested it to see is it MAYBE proper GG in it.

my suspicion is that is should be on zenit 3B, which IS really old (from 60s), but i didn't find one. (maybe because of hollydays and new year)
so if you can - please give us a clue from WHICH zenit your exellent GG is taken, so we can also test that (if we are lucky enough to find one).

filip

p.s.
you should show us more nice girls captured with your DANIELZenit35 adapter :)

Jim Lafferty
January 1st, 2004, 08:42 PM
Yeah...

Using proprietary, rare parts goes a long way to undermining the whole spirit of Agus's original design, which is to use parts that are cheap and readily available.

Also, Agus has produced the most visceral footage with his design...